The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring

Dan Farine*, Michael Shenhav, Ofer Barnea, Ariel Jaffa, Harold E. Fox

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Fetal heart rate monitors, including the newer pulse-oximetry and STAN monitors, are designed to detect fetal distress that affects less than 1% of women in labor. Non-progressive labor is a much more common disorder than fetal distress, with approximately 50% of women in labor requiring oxytocin. Current technology assessing labor progress is subjective and inaccurate. There is a need for objective and accurate technology to measure labor progress and the effect it may have on managing labor and, specifically, non-progressive labor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-164
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • Cervicometry
  • Labor
  • Labor monitoring
  • Labor progress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this