The likelihood of divorce and the riskiness of financial decisions

Oded Stark*, Krzysztof Szczygielski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We link causally the riskiness of men's management of their finances with the probability of their experiencing a divorce. Our point of departure is that when comparing single men to married men, the former manage their finances in a more aggressive (that is, riskier) manner. Assuming that single men believe that low relative wealth has a negative effect on their standing in the marriage market and that they care about their standing in that market more than married men do, we find that a stronger distaste for low relative wealth translates into reduced relative risk aversion and, consequently, into riskier financial behavior. With this relationship in place we show how this difference varies depending on the background likelihood of divorce and, hence, on the likelihood of re-entry into the marriage market: married men in environments that are more prone to divorce exhibit risk-taking behavior that is more similar to that of single men than married men in environments that are little prone to divorce. We offer a theoretical contribution that helps inform and interpret empirical observations and regularities and can serve as a guide for follow-up empirical work, having established and identified the direction of causality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-229
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Demographic Economics
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Concern at having low relative wealth
  • Likelihood of divorce
  • Marital-based difference in attitudes towards risk
  • Men's preferences towards risk
  • Relative and absolute risk aversion
  • Risk-taking behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The likelihood of divorce and the riskiness of financial decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this