TY - JOUR
T1 - The kingdom of geshur and the expansion of aram-damascus into the northern Jordan valley
T2 - Archaeological and historical perspectives
AU - Sergi, Omer
AU - Kleiman, Assaf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Schools of Oriental Research.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Fragmented texts in the Hebrew Bible mention a kingdom named Geshur, usually in contexts that denote its independent existence and relations with King David’s royal court (e.g., 2 Sam 3:3; 13:37–38; 14:32; 15:8). Scholars investigating the history of this kingdom have frequently commented on the ambiguous and non-informative nature of these verses, especially in regard to political history and foreign affairs. Others have emphasized the contribution of archaeological research for elucidating some of the aspects mentioned above, and, in particular, for demonstrating the existence of a territorial entity around the Sea of Galilee during the early 1st millennium b.c.e. Nonetheless, the dynamic discussion has not inspired a reevaluation of the archaeological record in the northern Jordan Valley, the presumed home of the Geshurites, and most scholars have uncritically adopted the traditional archaeological views regarding the dating of sites located in this region. In this article, we challenge the common dating of some key sites (e.g., et-Tell and Tel ʿEn Gev) and consequently reexamine the nature of the political formation that emerged in the region in the early Iron Age and its possible identification with the kingdom of Geshur.
AB - Fragmented texts in the Hebrew Bible mention a kingdom named Geshur, usually in contexts that denote its independent existence and relations with King David’s royal court (e.g., 2 Sam 3:3; 13:37–38; 14:32; 15:8). Scholars investigating the history of this kingdom have frequently commented on the ambiguous and non-informative nature of these verses, especially in regard to political history and foreign affairs. Others have emphasized the contribution of archaeological research for elucidating some of the aspects mentioned above, and, in particular, for demonstrating the existence of a territorial entity around the Sea of Galilee during the early 1st millennium b.c.e. Nonetheless, the dynamic discussion has not inspired a reevaluation of the archaeological record in the northern Jordan Valley, the presumed home of the Geshurites, and most scholars have uncritically adopted the traditional archaeological views regarding the dating of sites located in this region. In this article, we challenge the common dating of some key sites (e.g., et-Tell and Tel ʿEn Gev) and consequently reexamine the nature of the political formation that emerged in the region in the early Iron Age and its possible identification with the kingdom of Geshur.
KW - Aram-Damascus
KW - Geshur
KW - Hazael
KW - Iron age
KW - Israel
KW - Succession narrative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056829267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5615/bullamerschoorie.379.0001
DO - 10.5615/bullamerschoorie.379.0001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 0003-097X
VL - 379
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
JF - Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
IS - 1
ER -