TY - JOUR
T1 - The incidence and nature of malpractice claims against dentists for orthodontic treatment with periodontal damage in Israel during the years 2005–2018. A descriptive study
AU - Laviv, Amir
AU - Barnea, Eitan
AU - Green, Nirit Tagger
AU - Kadry, Rana
AU - Nassar, Dima
AU - Laviv, Meytal
AU - Kolerman, Roni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - In recent years, dental malpractice claims have increased dramatically worldwide. The purpose of the present study is to analyze claims related to orthodontic treatment involving periodontal problems that resulted in legal decisions in Israel. This study analyzed legal claims registered by Medical Consultants International (MCI) between 2005 and 2018. Only closed cases of orthodontic claims involving periodontal problems in which a decision was made were included. The parameters studied included patients’ demographic data, the main reasons of the claim, and complications. Statistical significance was found for aesthetic damage, which was more common in claims of females (p = 0.035) and in older claims (p = 0.004); tooth damage was more common in claims of older patients (p = 0.032); violation of autonomy was higher in private practice (p = 0.047) and in more recent claims (p = 0.001). As orthodontic treatment is becoming more popular in older patients, and as lawsuit claims become more common in recent years, the orthodontists should always analyze and document the periodontal status of their patients before and during treatment in order to maintain professional practice and avoid future claims.
AB - In recent years, dental malpractice claims have increased dramatically worldwide. The purpose of the present study is to analyze claims related to orthodontic treatment involving periodontal problems that resulted in legal decisions in Israel. This study analyzed legal claims registered by Medical Consultants International (MCI) between 2005 and 2018. Only closed cases of orthodontic claims involving periodontal problems in which a decision was made were included. The parameters studied included patients’ demographic data, the main reasons of the claim, and complications. Statistical significance was found for aesthetic damage, which was more common in claims of females (p = 0.035) and in older claims (p = 0.004); tooth damage was more common in claims of older patients (p = 0.032); violation of autonomy was higher in private practice (p = 0.047) and in more recent claims (p = 0.001). As orthodontic treatment is becoming more popular in older patients, and as lawsuit claims become more common in recent years, the orthodontists should always analyze and document the periodontal status of their patients before and during treatment in order to maintain professional practice and avoid future claims.
KW - Injury
KW - Lawsuit
KW - Malpractice
KW - Orthodontic treatment
KW - Periodontal treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096765441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17238785
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17238785
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33256065
AN - SCOPUS:85096765441
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 23
M1 - 8785
ER -