TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on Characteristics and Outcomes of Stroke Complicating TAVR
AU - ASTRO-TAVI Study Group
AU - Levi, Amos
AU - Linder, Matthias
AU - Seiffert, Moritz
AU - Witberg, Guy
AU - Pilgrim, Thomas
AU - Tomii, Daijiro
AU - Barkan, Yeela Tamlor
AU - Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
AU - Adrichem, Rik
AU - Codner, Pablo
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
AU - Arunothayaraj, Sandeep
AU - Perl, Leor
AU - Finkelstein, Ariel
AU - Loewenstein, Itamar
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Barnea, Rani
AU - Tarantini, Giuseppe
AU - Fovino, Luca Nai
AU - Vaknin-Assa, Hana
AU - Mylotte, Darren
AU - Wagener, Max
AU - Webb, John G.
AU - Akodad, Mariama
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Kargoli, Faraj
AU - Giannini, Francesco
AU - Ielasi, Alfonso
AU - Søndergaard, Lars
AU - Aviram, Itay
AU - Lerman, Tsahi T.
AU - Kheifets, Mark
AU - Auriel, Eitan
AU - Kornowski, Ran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2024/3/11
Y1 - 2024/3/11
N2 - Background: Acute ischemic stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) were developed to mitigate the risk of acute ischemic stroke complicating TAVR (AISCT). However, the existing body of evidence does not clearly support CEPD efficacy in AISCT prevention. Objectives: In a cohort of patients with AISCT, we aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who have had unprotected TAVR (CEPD−) vs CEPD-protected TAVR (CEPD+). Methods: Data were derived from an international multicenter registry focusing on AISCT. We included all patients who experienced ischemic stroke within 72 hours of TAVR. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Primary outcomes were neurologic disability status according to the modified Rankin Score at 30 days, and 6-month all-cause death. Propensity score matched analysis was used to control for differences between groups. Results: In 18,725 TAVR procedures, 416 AISCT (2.2%) within 72 hours were documented, of which 376 were in the CEPD− TAVR group and 40 in the CEPD+ TAVR group. Although the middle cerebral artery stroke rate was similar in both groups (29.7% CEPD− vs 33.3% CEPD+; P = 0.71), AISCT in the CEPD+ group was characterized by a lower rate of internal carotid artery occlusion (0% vs 4.7%) and higher rate of vertebrobasilar system strokes (15.4% vs 5.7%; P = 0.04). AISCT was severe (NIHSS ≥15) in 21.6% CEPD− and 23.3% CEPD+ AISCT (P = 0.20). Disabling stroke rates (modified Rankin Score >1 at 30 days) were 47.3% vs 42.5% (P = 0.62), and 6-month mortality was 31.3% vs 23.3% (P = 0.61), in the CEPD− and CEPD+ groups, respectively. In the propensity score matched cohort, disabling stroke rates were 56.5% vs 41.6% (P = 0.16), and 6-month mortality was 33% vs 19.5% (P = 0.35), in the CEPD− and CEPD+ groups, respectively. Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with AISCT, the use of CEPD had little effect on stroke distribution, severity, and outcomes.
AB - Background: Acute ischemic stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) were developed to mitigate the risk of acute ischemic stroke complicating TAVR (AISCT). However, the existing body of evidence does not clearly support CEPD efficacy in AISCT prevention. Objectives: In a cohort of patients with AISCT, we aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who have had unprotected TAVR (CEPD−) vs CEPD-protected TAVR (CEPD+). Methods: Data were derived from an international multicenter registry focusing on AISCT. We included all patients who experienced ischemic stroke within 72 hours of TAVR. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Primary outcomes were neurologic disability status according to the modified Rankin Score at 30 days, and 6-month all-cause death. Propensity score matched analysis was used to control for differences between groups. Results: In 18,725 TAVR procedures, 416 AISCT (2.2%) within 72 hours were documented, of which 376 were in the CEPD− TAVR group and 40 in the CEPD+ TAVR group. Although the middle cerebral artery stroke rate was similar in both groups (29.7% CEPD− vs 33.3% CEPD+; P = 0.71), AISCT in the CEPD+ group was characterized by a lower rate of internal carotid artery occlusion (0% vs 4.7%) and higher rate of vertebrobasilar system strokes (15.4% vs 5.7%; P = 0.04). AISCT was severe (NIHSS ≥15) in 21.6% CEPD− and 23.3% CEPD+ AISCT (P = 0.20). Disabling stroke rates (modified Rankin Score >1 at 30 days) were 47.3% vs 42.5% (P = 0.62), and 6-month mortality was 31.3% vs 23.3% (P = 0.61), in the CEPD− and CEPD+ groups, respectively. In the propensity score matched cohort, disabling stroke rates were 56.5% vs 41.6% (P = 0.16), and 6-month mortality was 33% vs 19.5% (P = 0.35), in the CEPD− and CEPD+ groups, respectively. Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients with AISCT, the use of CEPD had little effect on stroke distribution, severity, and outcomes.
KW - SENTINEL
KW - cerebral embolic protection device
KW - complications
KW - registry
KW - transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186770984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.033
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.033
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38479966
AN - SCOPUS:85186770984
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 17
SP - 666
EP - 677
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 5
ER -