TY - JOUR
T1 - THE GLOSSARY ŠARḤ AL-ʾALFĀẒ BY ABŪ AL-FARAJ HĀRŪN
T2 - DAVID BEN ABRAHAM ALFĀSĪ’S DICTIONARY JĀMIʿ AL-ʾALFĀẒ AS A RESOURCE
AU - Basal, Nasir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The purpose of this article is to prove that David Ben Abraham Alfāsī’s Dictionary Jāmiʿ al-alfāẓ, which is hardly mentioned in the mediaeval Hebrew linguistic literature, Karaite and Rabbanite alike, was one of the sources for the interpretations of biblical entries in Abū al-Faraj Hārūn’s glossary Šarḥ al-alfāẓ al-ṣaʿba fī al-Miqraʾ. This conclusion emerges and is presented here for the first time, following an analysis of Hārūn’s interpretations of the Biblical entries in the book of Isaiah in his work and their comparison with the interpretations of both Karaite and Rabbanite senior Biblical commentators of his time, such as Yefet Ben ʿAli (Abū al-Faraj’s main source of interpretation in Šarḥ al-alfāẓ), Abū Yaʿqūb Yūsuf Ibn Nūḥ (Abū al-Faraj’s teacher), Rabbi Sa‘adia Gaon and others, who used their commentaries to interpret the entries in his essay. Our conclusion is based on the fact that the interpretations found in Abū al-Faraj’s work are similar, in fact almost identical, only to David Ben Abraham’s interpretations in his Biblical dictionary Jāmiʿ al-alfāẓ and can be determined with almost certainty that it was his source. This is not surprising, as Abū al-Faraj Hārūn mentions David Ben Abraham’s dictionary (Agron) and its abridgment (muxtaṣar) twice in his al-Kitāb al-muštamil. In it he criticizes David Ben Abraham’s method in analyzing the Hebrew root (basic letters) and the work discussed here leans on his interpretations of the Bible.
AB - The purpose of this article is to prove that David Ben Abraham Alfāsī’s Dictionary Jāmiʿ al-alfāẓ, which is hardly mentioned in the mediaeval Hebrew linguistic literature, Karaite and Rabbanite alike, was one of the sources for the interpretations of biblical entries in Abū al-Faraj Hārūn’s glossary Šarḥ al-alfāẓ al-ṣaʿba fī al-Miqraʾ. This conclusion emerges and is presented here for the first time, following an analysis of Hārūn’s interpretations of the Biblical entries in the book of Isaiah in his work and their comparison with the interpretations of both Karaite and Rabbanite senior Biblical commentators of his time, such as Yefet Ben ʿAli (Abū al-Faraj’s main source of interpretation in Šarḥ al-alfāẓ), Abū Yaʿqūb Yūsuf Ibn Nūḥ (Abū al-Faraj’s teacher), Rabbi Sa‘adia Gaon and others, who used their commentaries to interpret the entries in his essay. Our conclusion is based on the fact that the interpretations found in Abū al-Faraj’s work are similar, in fact almost identical, only to David Ben Abraham’s interpretations in his Biblical dictionary Jāmiʿ al-alfāẓ and can be determined with almost certainty that it was his source. This is not surprising, as Abū al-Faraj Hārūn mentions David Ben Abraham’s dictionary (Agron) and its abridgment (muxtaṣar) twice in his al-Kitāb al-muštamil. In it he criticizes David Ben Abraham’s method in analyzing the Hebrew root (basic letters) and the work discussed here leans on his interpretations of the Bible.
KW - Biblical Hebrew philology and lexicography
KW - mediaeval Karaite glossaries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160632390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85160632390
SN - 0334-4118
VL - 2021
SP - 337
EP - 376
JO - Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam
JF - Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam
IS - 51
ER -