Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The GLIM consensus approach to diagnosis of malnutrition: A 5-year update

  • Tommy Cederholm*
  • , Gordon L. Jensen
  • , M. Isabel T.D. Correia
  • , M. Cristina Gonzalez
  • , Ryoji Fukushima
  • , Veeradej Pisprasert
  • , Renee Blaauw
  • , Diana Cardenas Braz
  • , Fernando Carrasco
  • , Alfonso J. Cruz Jentoft
  • , Cristina Cuerda
  • , David C. Evans
  • , Vanessa Fuchs-Tarlovsky
  • , Leah Gramlich
  • , Han Ping Shi
  • , Jeanette M. Hasse
  • , Michael Hiesmayr
  • , Naoki Hiki
  • , Harriët Jager-Wittenaar
  • , Shukri Jahit
  • Anayanet Jáquez, Heather Keller, Stanislaw Klek, Ainsley Malone, Kris M. Mogensen, Naoharu Mori, Manpreet Mundi, Maurizio Muscaritoli, Doris Ng, Ibolya Nyulasi, Matthias Pirlich, Stephane Schneider, Marian de van der Schueren, Soranit Siltharm, Pierre Singer, Alison Steiber, Kelly A. Tappenden, Jianchun Yu, André van Gossum, Jaw Yuan Wang, Marion F. Winkler, Rocco Barazzoni, Charlene Compher
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Uppsala University
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Vermont
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Teikyo Heisei University
  • Khon Kaen University
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy
  • Universidad de Chile
  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Hospital General de México
  • University of Alberta
  • Capital Medical University
  • Baylor Health Care System
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Kitasato University
  • Hanze University of Applied Sciences
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra
  • University of Waterloo
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Aichi Medical University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
  • La Trobe University
  • Monash University
  • Endocrinology
  • CHU de Nice
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation
  • Reichman University
  • Mission: Cure
  • University of Utah
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • Kaohsiung Medical University
  • Brown University
  • University of Trieste
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) introduced an approach for malnutrition diagnosis in 2019 comprised of screening followed by assessment of three phenotypic criteria: weight loss, low BMI, and low muscle mass, and two etiologic criteria: reduced food intake/assimilation, and inflammation/disease burden. This planned update reconsiders the GLIM framework based on published knowledge and experience over the past five years. Methods: A GLIM working group (n = 43 members) conducted a literature search spanning 2019–2024 using the keywords “Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition or GLIM”. Prior GLIM activities providing guidance for use of the criteria on muscle mass and inflammation were reviewed. Successive rounds of review and revision were used to achieve consensus. Results: More than 400 scientific reports are published in peer-reviewed journals, forming the basis of 10 systematic reviews, some including meta-analyses of GLIM validity that indicate strong construct and predictive validity. Limitations and future priorities are discussed. Working group findings suggest that assessment of low muscle mass should be guided by experience and available technological resources. Clinical judgement may suffice to evaluate the inflammation/disease burden etiologic criterion. No revisions of the weight loss, low BMI, or reduced food intake/assimilation criteria are suggested. Following two rounds of review and revision, the working group secured 100 % agreement with the conclusions reported in the 5-year update. Conclusion: Ongoing initiatives target priorities that include malnutrition risk screening procedures, GLIM adaptation to the intensive care setting, assessment in support of the reduced food intake/assimilation criterion, and determination of malnutrition in obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-20
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Nutrition
Volume49
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Inflammation
  • Malnutrition
  • Muscle
  • Screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The GLIM consensus approach to diagnosis of malnutrition: A 5-year update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this