TY - JOUR
T1 - The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT)
T2 - 6. Treatment group differences in visual field changes
AU - Krug, J.
AU - Chiavelli, M.
AU - Berry, I.
AU - Evans, C.
AU - Joyner, M.
AU - Kittay, R.
AU - Melanson, A.
AU - Stout, K.
AU - Way, R.
AU - Epstein, D.
AU - Berson, F.
AU - Latina, M.
AU - Melamed, S.
AU - Johnson, E.
AU - Lindenmeyer, A.
AU - McGee, R.
AU - Piva-Bowe, D.
AU - Smith, T. J.
AU - Wilensky, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
A list of the participants appears at the end of the article. This study was supported by grants EY 04626, EY 04614, EY 05889, EY 04582, EY 04634, EY 04563, EY 05875, EY 05884, and EY 04945 from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - PURPOSE: To determine the differences in visual fields during 42 months (3 1/2 years) of follow-up between eyes treated with argon laser trabeculoplasty first and eyes treated with topical medication first in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: Visual field examinations were obtained at enrollment, three and six months, and at six-month intervals thereafter during follow-up of 271 patients enrolled in the Glaucoma Laser Trial. Numeric analyses of the examination results, including global indices and patterns of localized changes, as well as masked subjective clinical impression, were used to compare the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean threshold for eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first was 0.3 dB better than that for eyes treated with topical medication first averaged over follow-up (95% confidence interval, [- 0.1, 0.7]; P = .17). More eyes treated with topical medication first (82 [31%] of 261 eyes) than eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first (61 [23%] of 261 eyes) had confirmed localized deterioration at least once during follow-up (P = .02). Improvement was nearly twice as common as deterioration on masked subjective impression in both groups through 30 months (2 1/2 years). Eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first were judged to have slightly more improvement and slightly less deterioration than eyes treated with topical medication first. CONCLUSION: During follow-up, measures of visual field status for eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first were slightly better than those for eyes treated with topical medication first. Statistical significance was attained for only some of the differences, and the clinical implications of such small differences are not known.
AB - PURPOSE: To determine the differences in visual fields during 42 months (3 1/2 years) of follow-up between eyes treated with argon laser trabeculoplasty first and eyes treated with topical medication first in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: Visual field examinations were obtained at enrollment, three and six months, and at six-month intervals thereafter during follow-up of 271 patients enrolled in the Glaucoma Laser Trial. Numeric analyses of the examination results, including global indices and patterns of localized changes, as well as masked subjective clinical impression, were used to compare the two treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean threshold for eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first was 0.3 dB better than that for eyes treated with topical medication first averaged over follow-up (95% confidence interval, [- 0.1, 0.7]; P = .17). More eyes treated with topical medication first (82 [31%] of 261 eyes) than eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first (61 [23%] of 261 eyes) had confirmed localized deterioration at least once during follow-up (P = .02). Improvement was nearly twice as common as deterioration on masked subjective impression in both groups through 30 months (2 1/2 years). Eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first were judged to have slightly more improvement and slightly less deterioration than eyes treated with topical medication first. CONCLUSION: During follow-up, measures of visual field status for eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty first were slightly better than those for eyes treated with topical medication first. Statistical significance was attained for only some of the differences, and the clinical implications of such small differences are not known.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029074087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73754-7
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)73754-7
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0029074087
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 120
SP - 10
EP - 22
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -