TY - JOUR
T1 - The future of sex and gender in psychology
T2 - Five challenges to the gender binary
AU - Hyde, Janet Shibley
AU - Bigler, Rebecca S.
AU - Joel, Daphna
AU - Tate, Charlotte Chucky
AU - van Anders, Sari M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - The view that humans comprise only two types of beings, women and men, a framework that is sometimes referred to as the "gender binary," played a profound role in shaping the history of psychological science. In recent years, serious challenges to the gender binary have arisen from both academic research and social activism. This review describes 5 sets of empirical findings, spanning multiple disciplines, that fundamentally undermine the gender binary. These sources of evidence include neuroscience findings that refute sexual dimorphism of the human brain; behavioral neuroendocrinology findings that challenge the notion of genetically fixed, nonoverlapping, sexually dimorphic hormonal systems; psychological findings that highlight the similarities between men and women; psychological research on transgender and nonbinary individuals' identities and experiences; and developmental research suggesting that the tendency to view gender/sex as a meaningful, binary category is culturally determined and malleable. Costs associated with reliance on the gender binary and recommendations for future research, as well as clinical practice, are outlined.
AB - The view that humans comprise only two types of beings, women and men, a framework that is sometimes referred to as the "gender binary," played a profound role in shaping the history of psychological science. In recent years, serious challenges to the gender binary have arisen from both academic research and social activism. This review describes 5 sets of empirical findings, spanning multiple disciplines, that fundamentally undermine the gender binary. These sources of evidence include neuroscience findings that refute sexual dimorphism of the human brain; behavioral neuroendocrinology findings that challenge the notion of genetically fixed, nonoverlapping, sexually dimorphic hormonal systems; psychological findings that highlight the similarities between men and women; psychological research on transgender and nonbinary individuals' identities and experiences; and developmental research suggesting that the tendency to view gender/sex as a meaningful, binary category is culturally determined and malleable. Costs associated with reliance on the gender binary and recommendations for future research, as well as clinical practice, are outlined.
KW - Gender
KW - Neuroscience
KW - Sex differences
KW - Social neuroendocrinology
KW - Transgender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050125079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/amp0000307
DO - 10.1037/amp0000307
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30024214
AN - SCOPUS:85050125079
SN - 0003-066X
VL - 74
SP - 171
EP - 193
JO - American Psychologist
JF - American Psychologist
IS - 2
ER -