The functional role of representations cannot explain basic implicit memory phenomena

Y. Goshen-Gottstein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

Abstract

The propositional account of explicit and implicit knowledge interprets cognitive differences between direct and indirect test performance as emerging from the elements in different hierarchical levels of the propositional representation that have been made explicit. The hierarchical nature of explicitness is challenged, however, on the basis of neuropsychological dissociations between direct and indirect tests of memory, as well as the stochastic independence that has been observed between these two types of tests. Furthermore, format specificity on indirect test of memory challenges the basic notion of a propositional theory of implicit and explicit knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)768-769
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The functional role of representations cannot explain basic implicit memory phenomena'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this