TY - JOUR
T1 - THE EXTENDED LEAST-SQUARES AND THE JOINT MAXIm-A-POSTERIORI - MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION CRITERIA
AU - Yeredor, Arie
AU - Weinstein, Ehud
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1999 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Approximate model equations often relate given measurements to unknown parameters whose estimate is sought. The Least-Squares (LS) estimation criterion assumes the measured data to be exact, and seeks parameters which minimize the model errors. Existing extensions of LS, such as the Total LS (TLS) and Constrained TLS (CTLS) take the opposite approach, namely assume the model equations to be exact, and attribute all errors to measurement inaccuracies. We introduce the Extended LS (XLS) criterion, which accommodates both error sources. We define 'pseudo-linear' models, with which we provide an iterative algorithm for minimization of the XLS criterion. Under certain statistical assumptions, we show that XLS coincides with a statistical criterion, which we term the 'joint Maximum-A-Posteriori - Maximum-Likelihood' (JMAP-ML) criterion. We identify the differences between the JMAP-ML and ML criteria, and explain the observed superiority of JMAP-ML over ML under non-asymptotic conditions.
AB - Approximate model equations often relate given measurements to unknown parameters whose estimate is sought. The Least-Squares (LS) estimation criterion assumes the measured data to be exact, and seeks parameters which minimize the model errors. Existing extensions of LS, such as the Total LS (TLS) and Constrained TLS (CTLS) take the opposite approach, namely assume the model equations to be exact, and attribute all errors to measurement inaccuracies. We introduce the Extended LS (XLS) criterion, which accommodates both error sources. We define 'pseudo-linear' models, with which we provide an iterative algorithm for minimization of the XLS criterion. Under certain statistical assumptions, we show that XLS coincides with a statistical criterion, which we term the 'joint Maximum-A-Posteriori - Maximum-Likelihood' (JMAP-ML) criterion. We identify the differences between the JMAP-ML and ML criteria, and explain the observed superiority of JMAP-ML over ML under non-asymptotic conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946017428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICASSP.1999.758273
DO - 10.1109/ICASSP.1999.758273
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.conferencearticle???
AN - SCOPUS:84946017428
SN - 1520-6149
VL - 4
SP - 1813
EP - 1816
JO - Proceedings - ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
JF - Proceedings - ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
T2 - Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-99)
Y2 - 15 March 1999 through 19 March 1999
ER -