TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy of minocycline mouth rinses on the symptoms associated with recurrent aphthous stomatitis
T2 - a randomized, double-blind, crossover study assessing different doses of oral rinse
AU - Yarom, Noam
AU - Zelig, Keren
AU - Epstein, Joel B.
AU - Gorsky, Meir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Objective The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of 2 different concentrations of minocycline mouthwashes on the symptoms of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). Study Design The 2-year study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Healthy patients with frequent RAS episodes received 2 sealed and computer-randomized marked kits containing minocycline mouthwashes (0.2% and 0.5% solution). The patients were asked to use 1 of the kits on the first episode of RAS, starting with the first onset of prodromal symptoms, until the symptoms resolved or up to a maximum of 10 days (whichever came first). The patients were asked to use their second kit during a subsequent episode. Results A total of 14 patients (8 males, 6 females) completed the 2 arms of the study. The mean intensity of pain was significantly lower when the 0.5% solution was used compared with the 0.2% solution (P = .027). The difference reached the level of statistical significance as soon as the end of the second day of use (P = .032). Only minor and temporary adverse reactions were documented. Conclusions We found that 0.5% minocycline mouth rinse was more effective than the 0.2% concentration, which had been suggested by our group in previous studies for the management of RAS.
AB - Objective The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of 2 different concentrations of minocycline mouthwashes on the symptoms of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). Study Design The 2-year study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Healthy patients with frequent RAS episodes received 2 sealed and computer-randomized marked kits containing minocycline mouthwashes (0.2% and 0.5% solution). The patients were asked to use 1 of the kits on the first episode of RAS, starting with the first onset of prodromal symptoms, until the symptoms resolved or up to a maximum of 10 days (whichever came first). The patients were asked to use their second kit during a subsequent episode. Results A total of 14 patients (8 males, 6 females) completed the 2 arms of the study. The mean intensity of pain was significantly lower when the 0.5% solution was used compared with the 0.2% solution (P = .027). The difference reached the level of statistical significance as soon as the end of the second day of use (P = .032). Only minor and temporary adverse reactions were documented. Conclusions We found that 0.5% minocycline mouth rinse was more effective than the 0.2% concentration, which had been suggested by our group in previous studies for the management of RAS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017407147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.013
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85017407147
SN - 2212-4403
VL - 123
SP - 675
EP - 679
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
IS - 6
ER -