The Efficacy of Cibenzoline in Preventing PES Induction of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Dog

  • GAD KEREN
  • , DAVID TEPPER
  • , BRENDA BUTLER
  • , DENNIS MIURA
  • , KEIKO AOGAICHI
  • , JOHN SOMBERG*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract: The electrophysiologic effects of cibenzoline were studied using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) techniques and were compared to those of quinidine. Cibenzoline, like the conventional class 1 agent quinidine, was effective in preventing arrhythmia induction. Twelve dogs were given 0.02 mg/kg digoxin intravenously for seven days to achieve a steady‐state digoxin level. On the eighth day, cibenzoline was administered in incremental doses (0.5 to 10.5 mg/kg) and PES was performed at 30‐minute intervals. A mean dose of 2.6 ± 0.8 mg/kg cibenzoline prevented ventricular tachycardia induction. At this dose, cibenzoline had no significant effect on mean arterial blood pressure, but PR interval increased by 17 ± 9 per cent, QRS duration by 27 ± 14 per cent, and the ventricular refractory period (ERP) for the first extra stimulus increased by 35 ± 9 per cent. A gradual decrease in heart rate and an increase in PR interval and QRS duration was caused by incremental doses of cibenzoline. In six additional animals, quinidine was administered in incremental doses (1 to 30 mg/kg) and PES performed at 30‐minute intervals. A mean of 15 ± 5 mg/kg prevented induction of ventricular tachycardia in five animals. No significant change in heart rate, PR, QRS, and ERP was found at the effective dose. 1984 American College of Clinical Pharmacology

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)466-472
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Efficacy of Cibenzoline in Preventing PES Induction of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Dog'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this