The effects of syntactic pressures and pragmatic considerations on predictive dependency formation

Maayan Keshev*, Aya Meltzer-Asscher

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

During sentence processing, comprehenders form predictions regarding the unfolding of the sentence. The current study is designed to tease apart the role of syntactic motivations, pragmatic considerations and contextual prediction in active dependency formation. Using both production and comprehension measures, we observe prediction for the resolution of a long-distance dependency, even in the absence of syntactic-licensing pressures. However, we find that predictive dependency formation is observed earlier when it is motivated by syntactic pressures. This suggests that the syntax plays a crucial role in this predictive process, even after controlling for pragmatic motivations. We propose that active dependency formation is faster or more binding in syntactically-motivated predictions (i.e. filler-gap dependencies) relative to pragmatically-motivated ones.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-272
Number of pages17
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Filler-gap dependencies
  • active filler
  • discourse prominence
  • filled gap effect
  • prediction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of syntactic pressures and pragmatic considerations on predictive dependency formation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this