The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls

Christine Lochner*, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Martin Kidd, Lian Taljaard, Naomi A. Fineberg, Trevor W. Robbins, Dan J. Stein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by executive function impairment and by clinical responsivity to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Executive planning deficits constitute a candidate endophenotype for OCD. It is not known whether this endophenotype is responsive to acute serotonin manipulation. Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effects of acute SSRI administration on executive function in patients with OCD, first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and healthy controls. Methods: A randomized double-blind cross-over study assessed the effects of single-dose escitalopram (20 mg) and placebo on executive planning in 24 patients with OCD, 13 clinically unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with OCD, and 28 healthy controls. Performance on a Tower of London task measuring executive planning was assessed 4 h after oral administration of the pharmacological challenge/placebo and compared across and within groups using a mixed model analysis of variance. Results: On the outcome measure of interest, i.e., the mean number of choices to obtain the correct solution, there was a marginally significant effect of group (F(2, 59) = 3.1; p = 0.052), with patients (least square (LS) mean 1.43; standard error [SE] 0.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31–1.55) and their relatives (LS mean 1.46; SE 0.08; 95% CI, 1.30–1.62) performing worse than matched healthy controls (LS mean 1.26; SE 0.05; 95% CI, 1.15–1.37) on placebo. There was a trend towards a significant group × treatment interaction (F(2, 58) = 2.8, p = 0.069), with post hoc tests showing (i) patients (p = 0.009; LS mean difference 0.23; SE 0.08) and relatives (p = 0.03; LS mean difference 0.22; SE 0.10) were more impaired compared to controls and (ii) escitalopram was associated with improved executive planning in patients with OCD (p = 0.013; LS mean difference 0.1; SE 0.04), but not other groups (both p ' 0.1; controls: LS mean difference − 0.03; SE 0.04; relatives: LS mean difference 0.02; SE 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with a view that there is impaired executive planning in OCD and that this constitutes a behavioural endophenotype. In patients with OCD, but not in relatives, acute SSRI administration ameliorated this deficit. Further investigation is needed to understand common and differential involvement of neurochemical systems in patients with OCD and their relatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3117-3123
Number of pages7
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume237
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
H. Lundbeck A/S
Medical Research Council
International College of Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
European College of Neuropsychopharmacology
Shionogi
Obsessive-Compulsive Foundation
GlaxoSmithKline
National Research Foundation
Modern Humanities Research Association
European Cooperation in Science and TechnologyCA16207
Wellcome Trust146301/Z/14/Z/, 110049, 110049/Z/15/Z

    Keywords

    • Endophenotype
    • Escitalopram
    • Executive functions
    • Obsessive–compulsive disorder
    • Pharmacological challenge
    • Serotonin

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of acute serotonin challenge on executive planning in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), their first-degree relatives, and healthy controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this