The effect of tooth wear, age and sex on facial height assessed by soft tissue analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of tooth wear, age and sex on facial height measurements based on soft tissue analysis. Methods: One hundred and twelve subjects (45 males and 67 females), 19-80 years of age (mean 43 ± 0.9 years), which were divided into three age groups, met the inclusion criteria. Tooth wear was assessed using a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4). Based on the tooth wear score, three groups were defined: mild, moderate and severe wear. Facial height was evaluated based on soft tissue measurements using frontal facial photographs. The dimension of the upper facial height (UFH) and lower facial height (LFH) and the ratio between the two (R-U-L) were measured. Results: Facial height dimensions (UFH, LFH) were significantly different between the three age groups and between the three tooth wear groups. Both the UFH and LFH measurements had a weak positive correlation with age (r =.40; r =.41, respectively) and with tooth wear (r =.40; r =.41, respectively). The R-U-L showed a significant difference (P <.001) between sexes as males showed slightly lower ratio compared with females; however, the R-U-L was not dependent upon age or tooth wear. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that although facial height is affected by age and tooth wear, the proportion between the upper to lower facial segments is constant and is not affected by the same parameters. A statistically significant difference in the R-U-L relative to sexes was noted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-352
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2020

Keywords

  • lower facial height
  • occlusal vertical dimension
  • tooth wear
  • upper facial height

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of tooth wear, age and sex on facial height assessed by soft tissue analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this