TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of endometrial injury on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates
AU - Levin, Dan
AU - Hasson, Joseph
AU - Cohen, Aviad
AU - Or, Yuval
AU - Ata, Baris
AU - Barzilay, Lilia
AU - Almog, Benny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/10/3
Y1 - 2017/10/3
N2 - Aim: To assess the effect of endometrial scratching (ES) on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome (IVF-ET) Materials and methods: Retrospective matched case control study including all fresh IVF cycles performed between January 2006 and December 2012 at an academic IVF center. ES with an endometrial biopsy catheter was performed in the cycle preceding the index IVF cycle. Patients (n = 238) were pair matched with controls according to age, number of previous failed IVF cycles and number of embryos transferred. Results: Demographic and cycle characteristics were comparable in all of the following: age, number of previous cycles, number of collected oocyte, number of embryos transferred and quality of transferred embryos. Implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable in both groups (28%, 34% and 18.4% vs 30%, 40.3% and 29%, in ES group and controls, respectively). Logistic regression analysis found no significant association between ES and pregnancy rate. Conclusions: Mechanical endometrial stimulation did not improve implantation and pregnancy rates. Furthermore, no factors that may predict which patients could benefit from ES were identified. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate possible benefits in different subsets of patients such as patients with recurrent implantation failures.
AB - Aim: To assess the effect of endometrial scratching (ES) on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome (IVF-ET) Materials and methods: Retrospective matched case control study including all fresh IVF cycles performed between January 2006 and December 2012 at an academic IVF center. ES with an endometrial biopsy catheter was performed in the cycle preceding the index IVF cycle. Patients (n = 238) were pair matched with controls according to age, number of previous failed IVF cycles and number of embryos transferred. Results: Demographic and cycle characteristics were comparable in all of the following: age, number of previous cycles, number of collected oocyte, number of embryos transferred and quality of transferred embryos. Implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable in both groups (28%, 34% and 18.4% vs 30%, 40.3% and 29%, in ES group and controls, respectively). Logistic regression analysis found no significant association between ES and pregnancy rate. Conclusions: Mechanical endometrial stimulation did not improve implantation and pregnancy rates. Furthermore, no factors that may predict which patients could benefit from ES were identified. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate possible benefits in different subsets of patients such as patients with recurrent implantation failures.
KW - Endometrial disruption
KW - IVF-ET outcome
KW - endometrial injury
KW - endometrial scratching
KW - implantation failure
KW - pipelle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018189735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09513590.2017.1318369
DO - 10.1080/09513590.2017.1318369
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 28447502
AN - SCOPUS:85018189735
SN - 0951-3590
VL - 33
SP - 779
EP - 782
JO - Gynecological Endocrinology
JF - Gynecological Endocrinology
IS - 10
ER -