TY - JOUR
T1 - The diversity dividends of a need-blind and color-blind affirmative action policy
AU - Alon, Sigal
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Grants #200800120 and #200900169 from the Spencer Foundation. I thank Erez Garnai for research assistance.
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - In the early to mid-2000s, four flagship Israeli selective universities incorporated a need-blind and color-blind affirmative action policy into their admissions practices. The program, which gives an edge in admission to academically borderline applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds, emphasizes structural disadvantages, such as neighborhood socioeconomic status and high school rigor. The results of this study, based on administrative data from the four universities, demonstrate that having such a policy in place made the four institutions, especially the echelons at the most selective departments, more diverse than they otherwise would have been. The rise in geographic, economic and demographic diversity of a student population suggests that the plan's focus on structural determinants of disadvantage yields broad diversity dividends. The paper discusses the relevance of the findings to the ongoing discussion of admission regimes, diversity and equality of opportunity in the US.
AB - In the early to mid-2000s, four flagship Israeli selective universities incorporated a need-blind and color-blind affirmative action policy into their admissions practices. The program, which gives an edge in admission to academically borderline applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds, emphasizes structural disadvantages, such as neighborhood socioeconomic status and high school rigor. The results of this study, based on administrative data from the four universities, demonstrate that having such a policy in place made the four institutions, especially the echelons at the most selective departments, more diverse than they otherwise would have been. The rise in geographic, economic and demographic diversity of a student population suggests that the plan's focus on structural determinants of disadvantage yields broad diversity dividends. The paper discusses the relevance of the findings to the ongoing discussion of admission regimes, diversity and equality of opportunity in the US.
KW - Admission regimes
KW - Affirmative action
KW - Disadvantaged populations
KW - Diversity
KW - Higher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053181279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.05.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:80053181279
SN - 0049-089X
VL - 40
SP - 1494
EP - 1505
JO - Social Science Research
JF - Social Science Research
IS - 6
ER -