The distinction between the general and the specific in sharḤ al-kĀfiya by raḌĪ al-dĪn al-astarĀbĀdhĪ1

Beata Sheyhatovitch*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article studies the terms ʿāmm (“general”) and khāṣṣ (“specific”) and their derivatives in Sharḥ al-Kāfiya by Raḍī al-Dīn al-Astarābādhī (d. ca. 1289). Their use is part of a major methodological tendency of distinguishing between the general and the specific, which likely formed in the grammatical literature under influences from other Islamic disciplines. The article surveys various contexts in which the notions are used in Sharḥ al-Kāfiya (namely, discussions on terminology, discussions on elements that can fill a given position, semantic analyses, and discussions on semantic shifts), and compares takhṣīṣ “specification/specificity” with two other, seemingly close, terms that actually have different meanings, viz. tawḍīḥ “clarification” and taʿrīf “definiteness.”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-119
Number of pages41
JournalJerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam
Volume2020
Issue number48
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Ibn al-Ḥājib
  • Mediaeval Arabic grammatical tradition/theory
  • Raḍī al-Dīn al-Astarābādhī
  • Sharḥ al-Kāfiya
  • Takhṣīṣ
  • Tawḍīḥ
  • Taʿrīf

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The distinction between the general and the specific in sharḤ al-kĀfiya by raḌĪ al-dĪn al-astarĀbĀdhĪ1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this