The distinction between coronary and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy by clinical markers of reperfusion

Shlomi Matetzky, Dov Freimark, Pierre Chouraqui, Ilya Novikov, Oren Agranat, Babeth Rabinowitz, Elieser Kaplinsky, Hanoch Hod*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to examine the hypothesis that rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with early peak creatine kinase (CK) after thrombolytic therapy differentiates among patients with early recanalization between those with and those without adequate tissue (myocardial) reperfusion. Background. Early recanalization of the epicardial infarct-related artery (IRA) during AMI does not ensure adequate reperfusion on the myocardial level. While early peak CK after thrombolysis results from early and abrupt restoration of the coronary flow to the infarcted area, rapid ST-segment resolution, which is another clinical marker of successful reperfusion, reflects changes of the myocardial tissue itself. Methods. We compared the clinical and the angiographic results of 162 AMI patients with early peak CK (≤12 h) after thrombolytic therapy with (group A) and without (group B) concomitant rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation. Results. Patients in groups A and B had similar patency rates of the IRA on angiography (anterior infarction: 93% vs. 93%; inferior infarction: 89% vs. 77%). Nevertheless, group A versus B patients had lower peak CK (anterior infarction: 1,083 ± 585 IU/ml vs. 1,950 ± 1,216, p < 0.01; and inferior infarction: 940 ± 750 IU/ml vs. 1,350 ± 820, p = 0.18) and better left ventricular ejection fraction (anterior infarction: 49 ± 8, vs. 44 ± 8, p < 0.01; inferior infarction: 56 ± 12 vs. 51 ± 10, p = 0.1). In a 2-year follow-up, group A as compared with group B patients had a lower rate of congestive heart failure (1% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and mortality (2% vs. 13%, p < 0.01). Conclusions. Among patients in whom reperfusion appears to have taken place using an early peak CK as a marker, the coexistence of rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation further differentiates among patients with an opened culprit artery between the ones with and without adequate myocardial reperfusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1326-1330
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The distinction between coronary and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy by clinical markers of reperfusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this