TY - JOUR
T1 - The Complex Relationships between Sex and the Brain
AU - Joel, Daphna
AU - Garcia-Falgueras, Alicia
AU - Swaab, Dick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - In the past decennia, our understanding of the sexual differentiation of the mammalian brain has dramatically changed. The simple model according to which testosterone masculinizes the brain of males away from a default female form, was replaced with a complex scenario, according to which sex effects on the brain of both females and males are exerted by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. These factors act via multiple partly independent mechanisms that may vary according to internal and external factors. These observations led to the “mosaic” hypothesis—the expectation of high variability in the degree of “maleness”/“femaleness” of different features within a single brain. Here, we briefly review animal data that form the basis of current understanding of sexual differentiation; present, in this context, the results of co-analyses of human brain measures obtained by magnetic resonance imaging or postmortem; discuss criticisms and controversies of the mosaic hypothesis and implications for research; and conclude that co-analysis of several (preferably, many) features and going back from the group level to that of the individual would advance our understanding of the relations between sex and the brain in health and disease.
AB - In the past decennia, our understanding of the sexual differentiation of the mammalian brain has dramatically changed. The simple model according to which testosterone masculinizes the brain of males away from a default female form, was replaced with a complex scenario, according to which sex effects on the brain of both females and males are exerted by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. These factors act via multiple partly independent mechanisms that may vary according to internal and external factors. These observations led to the “mosaic” hypothesis—the expectation of high variability in the degree of “maleness”/“femaleness” of different features within a single brain. Here, we briefly review animal data that form the basis of current understanding of sexual differentiation; present, in this context, the results of co-analyses of human brain measures obtained by magnetic resonance imaging or postmortem; discuss criticisms and controversies of the mosaic hypothesis and implications for research; and conclude that co-analysis of several (preferably, many) features and going back from the group level to that of the individual would advance our understanding of the relations between sex and the brain in health and disease.
KW - gender differences
KW - intermediate nucleus
KW - sex differences
KW - sexual differentiation
KW - sexually dimorphic nucleus
KW - transgender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073960797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1073858419867298
DO - 10.1177/1073858419867298
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 31509086
AN - SCOPUS:85073960797
SN - 1073-8584
VL - 26
SP - 156
EP - 169
JO - Neuroscientist
JF - Neuroscientist
IS - 2
ER -