TY - JOUR
T1 - The Commercial Consequences of Collective Layoffs
T2 - Close the Plant, Lose the Brand?
AU - Landsman, Vardit
AU - Stremersch, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Marketing Association 2020.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - This article examines the effects of collective layoff announcements on sales and marketing-mix elasticities, accounting for supply-side constraints. The authors study 205 announcements in the automotive industry using a difference-in-differences model. They find that, following collective layoff announcements, layoff firms experience adverse changes in sales, advertising elasticity, and price elasticity. They explore the moderating role of announcement characteristics on these changes and find that collective layoff announcements by domestic firms and announcements that do not mention a decline in demand as a motive are more likely to be followed by adverse marketing-mix elasticity changes. On average, sales for the layoff firm in the layoff country are 8.7% lower following a collective layoff announcement than their predicted levels absent the announcement. Similarly, advertising elasticity is 9.8% lower and price elasticity is 19.2% higher than absent the announcement. Conversely, layoff firms typically decrease advertising spending in the country where collective layoffs have occurred, yet they do not change prices. These findings are relevant to marketing managers of firms undergoing collective layoffs and to analysts of collective layoff decisions.
AB - This article examines the effects of collective layoff announcements on sales and marketing-mix elasticities, accounting for supply-side constraints. The authors study 205 announcements in the automotive industry using a difference-in-differences model. They find that, following collective layoff announcements, layoff firms experience adverse changes in sales, advertising elasticity, and price elasticity. They explore the moderating role of announcement characteristics on these changes and find that collective layoff announcements by domestic firms and announcements that do not mention a decline in demand as a motive are more likely to be followed by adverse marketing-mix elasticity changes. On average, sales for the layoff firm in the layoff country are 8.7% lower following a collective layoff announcement than their predicted levels absent the announcement. Similarly, advertising elasticity is 9.8% lower and price elasticity is 19.2% higher than absent the announcement. Conversely, layoff firms typically decrease advertising spending in the country where collective layoffs have occurred, yet they do not change prices. These findings are relevant to marketing managers of firms undergoing collective layoffs and to analysts of collective layoff decisions.
KW - advertising
KW - collective layoffs
KW - difference-in-differences
KW - downsizing
KW - marketing-mix elasticity
KW - price
KW - pricing
KW - sales
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081973671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022242919901277
DO - 10.1177/0022242919901277
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85081973671
SN - 0022-2429
VL - 84
SP - 122
EP - 141
JO - Journal of Marketing
JF - Journal of Marketing
IS - 3
ER -