[The clinician-scientist: proposal for a new paradigm].

Leonard Leibovici*, Mical Paul

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The decline in the attraction and prestige of the clinician-scientist paradigm is due to the dissonance between clinical work and conducting research in basic science. Medicine entails alleviating distress and prolonging life. Thus, medical research deals directly with the questions: what ails our patients and what shortens their lives? How can it be prevented? How can we alleviate suffering and prolong life? Research designs that fit these questions are: researcher (or patient) initiated randomized controlled trials; systematic reviews and meta-analysis; high-quality observational studies that address risk factors, natural history of disease, side-effects, and efficiency of treatment; research in ethics; and qualitative research. The clinician-scientist should perform medical research. Investing in this paradigm wilt encourage young doctors to conduct research directly oriented to benefit their patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-664, 683
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2010


Dive into the research topics of '[The clinician-scientist: proposal for a new paradigm].'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this