TY - JOUR
T1 - The Chatbots’ Challenge to Education
T2 - Disruption or Destruction?
AU - Birenbaum, Menucha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the author.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - The article addresses the positive and negative implications of the growing spread of chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) on instruction, learning, and assessment in education. It is based on extensive conversations with ChatGPT regarding pedagogy-related issues and relevant documents. Discussed are the challenges of chatbots like ChatGPT to educators—on the one hand, their potential to advance deep learning and the roles of the instructor and the school context in causing it to happen. On the other hand, it underscores the pedagogical drawbacks of improper usage of such chatbots and the instructional practices and school contexts that could escalate learning. Three school-culture components, namely classroom learning, teacher professional learning, and school leadership, are the essential aspects of pedagogical approaches that, in a particular constellation, could enhance and, in another, impede a chatbot’s potential to advance deep learning. The underlying theoretical framework is assessment-driven, contrasting assessment for learning (AfL) and assessment for grading, distinguishing assessment cultures from testing cultures. Patterns of chatbot usage that align with the principles of each culture are discussed. A sample of quotes from the conversations with ChatGPT is presented to support the insights gained from the chatting experience and the conclusions drawn.
AB - The article addresses the positive and negative implications of the growing spread of chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) on instruction, learning, and assessment in education. It is based on extensive conversations with ChatGPT regarding pedagogy-related issues and relevant documents. Discussed are the challenges of chatbots like ChatGPT to educators—on the one hand, their potential to advance deep learning and the roles of the instructor and the school context in causing it to happen. On the other hand, it underscores the pedagogical drawbacks of improper usage of such chatbots and the instructional practices and school contexts that could escalate learning. Three school-culture components, namely classroom learning, teacher professional learning, and school leadership, are the essential aspects of pedagogical approaches that, in a particular constellation, could enhance and, in another, impede a chatbot’s potential to advance deep learning. The underlying theoretical framework is assessment-driven, contrasting assessment for learning (AfL) and assessment for grading, distinguishing assessment cultures from testing cultures. Patterns of chatbot usage that align with the principles of each culture are discussed. A sample of quotes from the conversations with ChatGPT is presented to support the insights gained from the chatting experience and the conclusions drawn.
KW - assessment for learning (AfL)
KW - ChatGPT
KW - improving classroom teaching and learning
KW - LLMs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166027284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/educsci13070711
DO - 10.3390/educsci13070711
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:85166027284
SN - 2227-7102
VL - 13
JO - Education Sciences
JF - Education Sciences
IS - 7
M1 - 711
ER -