TY - JOUR
T1 - The Canonization of the Pentateuch
T2 - When and Why? (Part I)
AU - Fantalkin, Alexander
AU - Tal, Oren
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - The canonization of the Pentateuch has preoccupied scholars from different disciplines from antiquity to the present. However, two major questions still require an explanation: when did it happen and why did it happen? In this two-part article an attempt has been made to clarify these issues. Based on an interdisciplinary approach, where the insights of redaction criticism are merged with archaeologically-supported historical analysis, we suggest that the inception of the Torah-canonization should be viewed within the framework of the geopolitical transformation that characterized the first half of the fourth century BCE, when, following a major Egyptian rebellion, Egypt was no longer a part of the Persian Empire, while southern Palestine became the empire's frontier for the first time in more than a century of Achaemenid rule. The canonization of the essentially anti-Egyptian version of the Torah in the early fourth century BCE should be considered as a conscious response of Jerusalem's priestly circles to this new reality, signaling to the imperial authorities that they are dealing with loyal subjects that consider Egypt as a world of chaos, an antithesis to the world of cosmic order, so central to Persian imperial self-understanding.
AB - The canonization of the Pentateuch has preoccupied scholars from different disciplines from antiquity to the present. However, two major questions still require an explanation: when did it happen and why did it happen? In this two-part article an attempt has been made to clarify these issues. Based on an interdisciplinary approach, where the insights of redaction criticism are merged with archaeologically-supported historical analysis, we suggest that the inception of the Torah-canonization should be viewed within the framework of the geopolitical transformation that characterized the first half of the fourth century BCE, when, following a major Egyptian rebellion, Egypt was no longer a part of the Persian Empire, while southern Palestine became the empire's frontier for the first time in more than a century of Achaemenid rule. The canonization of the essentially anti-Egyptian version of the Torah in the early fourth century BCE should be considered as a conscious response of Jerusalem's priestly circles to this new reality, signaling to the imperial authorities that they are dealing with loyal subjects that consider Egypt as a world of chaos, an antithesis to the world of cosmic order, so central to Persian imperial self-understanding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860869213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/zaw-2012-0001
DO - 10.1515/zaw-2012-0001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84860869213
SN - 0044-2526
VL - 124
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Zeitschrift fur die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
JF - Zeitschrift fur die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
IS - 1
ER -