TY - JOUR
T1 - The benefit of active management in true knot of the umbilical cord
T2 - a retrospective study
AU - Weissbach, Tal
AU - Lev, Shir
AU - Back, Yonatan
AU - Massarwa, Abeer
AU - Meyer, Raanan
AU - Elkan Miller, Tal
AU - Weissmann-Brenner, Alina
AU - Weisz, Boaz
AU - Mazaki-Tovi, Shali
AU - Kassif, Eran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Purpose: To compare perinatal outcomes between active and routine management in true knot of the umbilical cord (TKUC). Methods: A retrospective study of singletons born beyond 22 6/7 weeks with TKUC. Active management included weekly fetal heart rate monitoring(FHRM) ≥ 30 weeks and labor induction at 36–37 weeks. Outcomes in active and routine management were compared, including composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome, fetal death, labor induction, Cesarean section (CS) or Instrumental delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), Apgar5 score < 7, cord Ph < 7, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and more. Results: The Active (n = 59) and Routine (n = 1091) Management groups demonstrated similar rates of composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome (16.9% vs 16.8%, p = 0.97). Active Management resulted in higher rates of labor induction < 37 weeks (22% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), CS (37.3% vs 19.2%, p = 0.003) and NICU admissions (13.6% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Fetal death occurred exclusively in the Routine Management group (1.8% vs 0%, p = 0.6). Conclusion: Compared with routine management, weekly FHRM and labor induction between 36 and 37 weeks in TKUC do not appear to reduce neonatal asphyxia. In its current form, active management is associated with higher rates of CS, induced prematurity and NICU admissions. Labor induction before 37 weeks should be avoided.
AB - Purpose: To compare perinatal outcomes between active and routine management in true knot of the umbilical cord (TKUC). Methods: A retrospective study of singletons born beyond 22 6/7 weeks with TKUC. Active management included weekly fetal heart rate monitoring(FHRM) ≥ 30 weeks and labor induction at 36–37 weeks. Outcomes in active and routine management were compared, including composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome, fetal death, labor induction, Cesarean section (CS) or Instrumental delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), Apgar5 score < 7, cord Ph < 7, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and more. Results: The Active (n = 59) and Routine (n = 1091) Management groups demonstrated similar rates of composite asphyxia-related adverse outcome (16.9% vs 16.8%, p = 0.97). Active Management resulted in higher rates of labor induction < 37 weeks (22% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), CS (37.3% vs 19.2%, p = 0.003) and NICU admissions (13.6% vs 3%, p < 0.001). Fetal death occurred exclusively in the Routine Management group (1.8% vs 0%, p = 0.6). Conclusion: Compared with routine management, weekly FHRM and labor induction between 36 and 37 weeks in TKUC do not appear to reduce neonatal asphyxia. In its current form, active management is associated with higher rates of CS, induced prematurity and NICU admissions. Labor induction before 37 weeks should be avoided.
KW - Fetal death
KW - Neonatal asphyxia
KW - Non-reassuring fetal heart rate
KW - Prenatal diagnosis
KW - True knot of the umbilical cord
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195180439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-024-07568-1
DO - 10.1007/s00404-024-07568-1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38829389
AN - SCOPUS:85195180439
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 310
SP - 337
EP - 344
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 1
ER -