TY - JOUR
T1 - The anteroposterior pericardial sac diameter measured by echocardiography correlates with the volume of pericardial effusion and with effort dyspnea
AU - Mager, Aviv
AU - Birnbaum, Yochai
AU - Adler, Yehuda
AU - Imbar, Shula
AU - Strasberg, Boris
AU - Battler, Alexander
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - Aims: To examine the value of the anteroposterior pericardial sac diameter (APD) for prediction of the volume of pericardial effusion. Methods and results: We measured the APD by echocardiography before 52 pericardiocentesis procedures and correlated it with the aspirate volume, etiology, symptoms, and clinical outcome. The volume of the aspirate ranged from 60 to 2300 ml (median 650 ml). The APD (range 8.0 cm-15.9 cm, median 12 cm) correlated well with the cubic root of the volume of the effusion [volume = (0.8APD-0.6)3, r2 = 0.533, p < = 0.533, p < 0.01]. An APD ≥ 12 cm had a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 83% for effusion volume above the sample median (≥ 650 ml) and a positive predictive value of 100% for effusion in the middle or upper aspirate volume tertiles. Effort dyspnea was more common among patients with APD ≥ 12.0 cm (n = 13) than in those with APD < 12.0 cm (n = 11) (p = 0.007). One-year survival after pericardiocentesis was closely related to the severity of the underlying etiology and was not influenced by the volume of the effusion before aspiration. Conclusions: The APD is a simple, valuable method for non-invasive prediction of pericardial fluid volume. A greater APD is associated with, and may explain, effort dyspnea.
AB - Aims: To examine the value of the anteroposterior pericardial sac diameter (APD) for prediction of the volume of pericardial effusion. Methods and results: We measured the APD by echocardiography before 52 pericardiocentesis procedures and correlated it with the aspirate volume, etiology, symptoms, and clinical outcome. The volume of the aspirate ranged from 60 to 2300 ml (median 650 ml). The APD (range 8.0 cm-15.9 cm, median 12 cm) correlated well with the cubic root of the volume of the effusion [volume = (0.8APD-0.6)3, r2 = 0.533, p < = 0.533, p < 0.01]. An APD ≥ 12 cm had a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 83% for effusion volume above the sample median (≥ 650 ml) and a positive predictive value of 100% for effusion in the middle or upper aspirate volume tertiles. Effort dyspnea was more common among patients with APD ≥ 12.0 cm (n = 13) than in those with APD < 12.0 cm (n = 11) (p = 0.007). One-year survival after pericardiocentesis was closely related to the severity of the underlying etiology and was not influenced by the volume of the effusion before aspiration. Conclusions: The APD is a simple, valuable method for non-invasive prediction of pericardial fluid volume. A greater APD is associated with, and may explain, effort dyspnea.
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Outcome
KW - Pericardial effusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24344466189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euje.2004.12.007
DO - 10.1016/j.euje.2004.12.007
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:24344466189
SN - 1525-2167
VL - 6
SP - 358
EP - 362
JO - European Journal of Echocardiography
JF - European Journal of Echocardiography
IS - 5
ER -