The Allocation of Housework in Same- and Different-Sex Partnerships: Recent Evidence from the U.S

Amit Lazarus*, Hadas Mandel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research on the division of housework among same-sex partners is limited. This is because gender-cultural theories – which emphasize the significance of gender identity and motivate many studies on the topic – are implicitly assumed to be less relevant in this case. Attending to admonitions that the division of housework in same-sex households is not free from gendering processes and practices, in this study we use the high-quality data of the American Time Use Survey (ATUS; 2003-2019), to compare the association between housework and relative earnings across partnership types. Since gender-cultural theories are based on the performance of gender identity by different-sex partners, we utilize the differences between same- and different-sex partners to better understand the effect of gender-cultural determinants on the division of housework. Our comparison of the relation across partnership-types validates the power of gender-cultural mechanisms in different-sex partners, provides a better assessment of the differences in housework patterns between different types of households, and serves as a novel quantitative test of gender-cultural mechanisms in same-sex partners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-408
Number of pages15
JournalSex Roles
Volume89
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Funding

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
H2020 European Research Council724351
European Research Council
Israel Science Foundation1111/22

    Keywords

    • Division of housework
    • Division of labor
    • Family economics
    • Gender display
    • Gender roles
    • Same-sex partnerships

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Allocation of Housework in Same- and Different-Sex Partnerships: Recent Evidence from the U.S'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this