Tests of the standard model with lepton pair production in e+e- reactions

Ch Berger*, A. Deuter, H. Genzel, W. Lackas, J. Pielorz, F. Raupach, W. Wagner, A. Klovning, E. Lillestöl, J. Bürger, L. Criegee, F. Ferrarotto, G. Franke, M. Gaspero, Ch Gerke, G. Knies, B. Lewendel, J. Meyer, U. Michelsen, K. H. PapeB. Stella, U. Timm, G. G. Winter, M. Zachara, W. Zimmermann, P. J. Bussey, S. L. Cartwright, J. B. Dainton, B. T. King, C. Raine, J. M. Scarr, I. O. Skillicorn, K. M. Smith, J. C. Thomson, O. Achterberg, V. Blobel, D. Burkart, K. Diehlmann, M. Feindt, H. Kapitza, B. Koppitz, M. Krüger, M. Poppe, H. Spitzer, R. van Staa, C. Y. Chang, R. G. Glasser, R. G. Kellogg, S. J. Maxfield, R. O. Polvado, B. Sechi-Zorn, J. A. Skard, A. Skuja, A. J. Tylka, G. E. Welch, G. T. Zorn, F. Almeida, A. Bäcker, F. Barreiro, S. Brandt, K. Derikum, C. Grupen, H. J. Meyer, H. Müller, B. Neumann, M. Rost, K. Stupperich, G. Zech, G. Alexander, G. Bella, Y. Gnat, J. Grunhaus, H. Junge, K. Kraski, C. Maxeiner, H. Maxeiner, H. Meyer, D. Schmidt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

The differential cross section of the reaction e+e-→e+e- at a c.m. energy of 34.7 GeV has been measured. The result, together with our previously measured e+e-→α+α- data, are compared with the standard model predictions. We obtain for the weak neutral current couplings the values gv2=0.09×0.06, ga2=0.38×0.08. A fit of the Weinberg mixing angle gives the value gv2=0.09×0.06, ga2=0.038×0.08. The data are also used to set limits on possible deviations from the pointlike structure of leptons. An upper limit for the e+e- coupling to a heavy spin 0 boson is also given.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-349
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Physical Journal C
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1985

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tests of the standard model with lepton pair production in e+e- reactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this