TY - JOUR
T1 - Testicular sperm retrieval
T2 - What should we expect from the fresh and subsequent cryopreserved sperm injection?
AU - Aizer, Adva
AU - Dratviman-Storobinsky, Olga
AU - Noach-Hirsh, Meirav
AU - Konopnicki, Sarah
AU - Lazarovich, Alon
AU - Raviv, Gil
AU - Orvieto, Raoul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - We sought to compare ICSI outcomes of cycle using fresh versus thawed TESE spermatozoa obtained during the previous fresh TESE. All consecutive couples undergoing ICSI cycles using fresh TESE spermatozoa, followed by ICSI cycle using cryopreserved sperm remaining from the previous fresh TESE procedure were included. Ovarian stimulation (OS)/laboratory variables and cycle outcome were assessed and compared between those utilising fresh versus thawed TESE spermatozoa. Seventy-five couples were evaluated, with no in-between groups differences in OS nor embryological variables. While implantation and LBR per embryo transfer were nonsignificantly higher in the frozen as compared to the fresh TESE, there was a trend towards higher LBRs per patient in the frozen TESE group. The cumulative miscarriage rate (4% versus 14.7%, p <.022 respectively) was significantly lower and the cumulative LBR (34.7% versus 16%, p <.007 respectively) was significantly higher using frozen TESE spermatozoa. Moreover, significantly higher proportion of frozen TESE sperm samples used pentoxifylline to enhance sperm motility. In conclusion, the results of ICSI cycles using frozen TESE spermatozoa are as good, or even better than using fresh TESE spermatozoa. Further studies are required to explore the factors responsible for the improved ICSI outcome, while using frozen versus fresh TESE sperm samples.
AB - We sought to compare ICSI outcomes of cycle using fresh versus thawed TESE spermatozoa obtained during the previous fresh TESE. All consecutive couples undergoing ICSI cycles using fresh TESE spermatozoa, followed by ICSI cycle using cryopreserved sperm remaining from the previous fresh TESE procedure were included. Ovarian stimulation (OS)/laboratory variables and cycle outcome were assessed and compared between those utilising fresh versus thawed TESE spermatozoa. Seventy-five couples were evaluated, with no in-between groups differences in OS nor embryological variables. While implantation and LBR per embryo transfer were nonsignificantly higher in the frozen as compared to the fresh TESE, there was a trend towards higher LBRs per patient in the frozen TESE group. The cumulative miscarriage rate (4% versus 14.7%, p <.022 respectively) was significantly lower and the cumulative LBR (34.7% versus 16%, p <.007 respectively) was significantly higher using frozen TESE spermatozoa. Moreover, significantly higher proportion of frozen TESE sperm samples used pentoxifylline to enhance sperm motility. In conclusion, the results of ICSI cycles using frozen TESE spermatozoa are as good, or even better than using fresh TESE spermatozoa. Further studies are required to explore the factors responsible for the improved ICSI outcome, while using frozen versus fresh TESE sperm samples.
KW - ICSI
KW - azoospermia
KW - fresh
KW - frozen-thawed
KW - live birth rate
KW - testicular sperm retrieval
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092654770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/and.13849
DO - 10.1111/and.13849
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33070352
AN - SCOPUS:85092654770
SN - 0303-4569
VL - 53
JO - Andrologia
JF - Andrologia
IS - 1
M1 - e13849
ER -