TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge About Children's Minds and Learning
T2 - Implications for Teacher Education
AU - Strauss, Sidney
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported here has been supportedl by the Chief Scientists' Office of the Israeli Ministry of Education. This is working paper No. 92-45 of the Unit of Huiman Development and Education.
PY - 1993/6
Y1 - 1993/6
N2 - The theory and research presented address teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge about children's minds and learning as they relate to teacher education. The theory suggests that without determining the nature of teachers’ mental models about children's minds and learning before instructors teach them preservice and inservice courses, instructors will r.ot be able to engage the mental models they have about those areas. And if instructors do not engage those mental models, they are likely to remain unchanged, Two studies were conducted to uncover teachers’ implicit, unreflective mental models about children's minds and leaning when teachers spoke about instruction (espoused mental models) and when they actually taught (in-use mental models). In the former, teachers have a mental model resembling information-processing models from the cognitive sciences. In the latter, teachers have a mental model whose main unit is meta-assumptions about children's minds. These meta-assumptions constrain the cognitive goals they want to achieve in their pupils and the teaching methods they employ to achieve those goals. In a third study, my research team and I tested the effects of an inservice teacher training course that attempted to make explicit teachers’ implicit espoused and in-use mental models and to connect them.
AB - The theory and research presented address teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge about children's minds and learning as they relate to teacher education. The theory suggests that without determining the nature of teachers’ mental models about children's minds and learning before instructors teach them preservice and inservice courses, instructors will r.ot be able to engage the mental models they have about those areas. And if instructors do not engage those mental models, they are likely to remain unchanged, Two studies were conducted to uncover teachers’ implicit, unreflective mental models about children's minds and leaning when teachers spoke about instruction (espoused mental models) and when they actually taught (in-use mental models). In the former, teachers have a mental model resembling information-processing models from the cognitive sciences. In the latter, teachers have a mental model whose main unit is meta-assumptions about children's minds. These meta-assumptions constrain the cognitive goals they want to achieve in their pupils and the teaching methods they employ to achieve those goals. In a third study, my research team and I tested the effects of an inservice teacher training course that attempted to make explicit teachers’ implicit espoused and in-use mental models and to connect them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948874139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15326985ep2803_7
DO - 10.1207/s15326985ep2803_7
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84948874139
VL - 28
SP - 279
EP - 290
JO - Educational Psychologist
JF - Educational Psychologist
SN - 0046-1520
IS - 3
ER -