TY - JOUR
T1 - T-cell-replete haploidentical transplantation versus autologous stem cell transplantation in adult acute leukemia
T2 - A matched pair analysis
AU - Gorin, Norbert Claude
AU - Labopin, Myriam
AU - Piemontese, Simona
AU - Arcese, William
AU - Santarone, Stella
AU - Huang, He
AU - Meloni, Giovanna
AU - Ferrara, Felicetto
AU - Beelen, Dietrich
AU - Sanz, Miguel
AU - Bacigalupo, Andrea
AU - Ciceri, Fabio
AU - Mailhol, Audrey
AU - Nagler, Arnon
AU - Mohty, Mohamad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Ferrata Storti Foundation.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Adult patients with acute leukemia in need of a transplant but without a genoidentical donor are usually considered upfront for transplantation with stem cells from any other allogeneic source, rather than autologous stem cell transplantation. We used data from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and performed a matched pair analysis on 188 T-cell-replete haploidentical and 356 autologous transplants done from January 2007 to December 2012, using age, diagnosis, disease status, cytogenetics, and interval from diagnosis to transplant as matching factors. “Haploidentical expert” centers were defined as having reported more than five haploidentical transplants for acute leukemia (median value for the study period). The median follow-up was 28 months. Multivariate analyses, including type of transplant categorized into three classes (“haploidentical regular”, “haploidentical expert” and autologous), conditioning intensity (reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning) and the random effect taking into account associations related to matching, showed that non-relapse mortality was higher following haploidentical transplants in expert (HR: 4.7; P=0.00004) and regular (HR: 8.98; P<10-5) centers. Relapse incidence for haploidentical transplants was lower in expert centers (HR:0.39; P=0.0003) but in regular centers was similar to that for autologous transplants. Leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates were higher following autologous transplantation than haploidentical transplants in regular centers (HR: 1.63; P=0.008 and HR: 2.31; P=0.0002 respectively) but similar to those following haploidentical transplants in expert centers. We conclude that autologous stem cell transplantation should presently be considered as a possible alternative to haploidentical transplantation in regular centers that have not developed a specific expert program.
AB - Adult patients with acute leukemia in need of a transplant but without a genoidentical donor are usually considered upfront for transplantation with stem cells from any other allogeneic source, rather than autologous stem cell transplantation. We used data from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and performed a matched pair analysis on 188 T-cell-replete haploidentical and 356 autologous transplants done from January 2007 to December 2012, using age, diagnosis, disease status, cytogenetics, and interval from diagnosis to transplant as matching factors. “Haploidentical expert” centers were defined as having reported more than five haploidentical transplants for acute leukemia (median value for the study period). The median follow-up was 28 months. Multivariate analyses, including type of transplant categorized into three classes (“haploidentical regular”, “haploidentical expert” and autologous), conditioning intensity (reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning) and the random effect taking into account associations related to matching, showed that non-relapse mortality was higher following haploidentical transplants in expert (HR: 4.7; P=0.00004) and regular (HR: 8.98; P<10-5) centers. Relapse incidence for haploidentical transplants was lower in expert centers (HR:0.39; P=0.0003) but in regular centers was similar to that for autologous transplants. Leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates were higher following autologous transplantation than haploidentical transplants in regular centers (HR: 1.63; P=0.008 and HR: 2.31; P=0.0002 respectively) but similar to those following haploidentical transplants in expert centers. We conclude that autologous stem cell transplantation should presently be considered as a possible alternative to haploidentical transplantation in regular centers that have not developed a specific expert program.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926349937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2014.111450
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2014.111450
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25637051
AN - SCOPUS:84926349937
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 100
SP - 558
EP - 564
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 4
ER -