TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of natural and miscellaneous agents, for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines — part 2
T2 - honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents
AU - On behalf of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer / International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO)
AU - Yarom, Noam
AU - Hovan, Allan
AU - Bossi, Paolo
AU - Ariyawardana, Anura
AU - Jensen, Siri Beier
AU - Gobbo, Margherita
AU - Saca-Hazboun, Hanan
AU - Kandwal, Abhishek
AU - Majorana, Alessandra
AU - Ottaviani, Giulia
AU - Pentenero, Monica
AU - Nasr, Narmin Mohammed
AU - Rouleau, Tanya
AU - Lucas, Anna Skripnik
AU - Treister, Nathaniel Simon
AU - Zur, Eyal
AU - Ranna, Vinisha
AU - Vaddi, Anusha
AU - Barasch, Andrei
AU - Lalla, Rajesh V.
AU - Cheng, Karis Kin Fong
AU - Elad, Sharon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Objective: To update the clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral mucositis (OM) that were developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). This part focuses on honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each clinical setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, one of the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, No Guideline Possible. Results: A total of 78 papers were identified within the scope of this section, of which 49 were included in this review and merged with nine publications that were reported in the previous guidelines update. A new Suggestion was made for honey (combined topical and systemic delivery) for the prevention of OM in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A new Suggestion clarified that chewing gum is not effective for the prevention of OM in pediatric patients with hematological or solid cancer treated with chemotherapy. No guideline was possible for other interventions. Conclusions: Numerous natural products and herbal remedies were studied for the management of OM. Of the agents reviewed in this systematic review, a guideline in favor was made for honey (combined topical and systemic), while a guideline against was made for chewing gum. Additional research is warranted to clarify the potential of other interventions.
AB - Objective: To update the clinical practice guidelines for the management of oral mucositis (OM) that were developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). This part focuses on honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each clinical setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, one of the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, No Guideline Possible. Results: A total of 78 papers were identified within the scope of this section, of which 49 were included in this review and merged with nine publications that were reported in the previous guidelines update. A new Suggestion was made for honey (combined topical and systemic delivery) for the prevention of OM in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A new Suggestion clarified that chewing gum is not effective for the prevention of OM in pediatric patients with hematological or solid cancer treated with chemotherapy. No guideline was possible for other interventions. Conclusions: Numerous natural products and herbal remedies were studied for the management of OM. Of the agents reviewed in this systematic review, a guideline in favor was made for honey (combined topical and systemic), while a guideline against was made for chewing gum. Additional research is warranted to clarify the potential of other interventions.
KW - Cancer
KW - Complementary
KW - Herbal
KW - Management
KW - Natural
KW - Oral mucositis
KW - Traditional
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079424288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-019-05256-4
DO - 10.1007/s00520-019-05256-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32056010
AN - SCOPUS:85079424288
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 28
SP - 2457
EP - 2472
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 5
ER -