Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis of tocilizumab therapy versus standard of care in over 15,000 covid-19 pneumonia patients during the first eight months of the pandemic

  • Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer
  • Istanbul Medipol University
  • University of Leeds
  • Western Galilee Medical Center of Nahariya
  • Bar-Ilan University
  • University of Toronto
  • Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • University of Parma
  • Ziv Medical Center
  • St. Petersburg State University
  • Ariel University
  • York University Toronto
  • University of Genoa
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Tocilizumab is an anti-IL-6 therapy widely adopted in the management of the so-called “cytokine storm” related to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, but its effectiveness, use in relation to concomitant corticosteroid therapy and safety were unproven despite widespread use in numerous studies, mostly open label at the start of the pandemic. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies utilising tocilizumab in COVID-19 on different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/Scopus) and preprint servers (medRxiv and SSRN) from in-ception until 20 July 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42020195690). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed. The impact of tocilizumab and concomitant corticosteroid therapy or tocilizumab alone versus standard of care (SOC) on the death rate, need for mechanical ventilation, ICU admission and bacterial infections were assessed. Results. Thirty-nine studies with 15,531 patients (3657 cases versus 11,874 controls) were identified. Unadjusted estimates (n = 28) failed to demonstrate a protective effect of tocilizumab on survival (OR 0.74 ([95%CI 0.55–1.01], p = 0.057), mechanical ventilation prevention (OR 2.21 [95%CI 0.53–9.23], p = 0.277) or prevention of ICU admission (OR 3.79 [95%CI 0.38–37.34], p = 0.254). Considering studies with adjusted, estimated, tocilizumab use was associated with mortality rate reduction (HR 0.50 ([95%CI 0.38–0.64], p < 0.001) and prevention of ICU admission (OR 0.16 ([95%CI 0.06–0.43], p < 0.001). Tocilizumab with concomitant steroid use versus SOC was protective with an OR of 0.49 ([95%CI 0.36–0.65], p < 0.05) as was tocilizumab alone versus SOC with an OR of 0.59 ([95%CI 0.34–1.00], p < 0.001). Risk of infection increased (2.36 [95%CI 1.001–5.54], p = 0.050; based on unadjusted estimates). Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity of in-cluded studies and large number of preprint articles, our findings from the first eight of the pandemic in over 15,000 COVID-19 cases suggested an incremental efficacy of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 that were confirmed by subsequent meta-analyses of large randomized trials of tocili-zumab. This suggests that analysis of case-control studies and pre-print server data in the early stages of a pandemic appeared robust for supporting incremental benefits and lack of major therapeutic toxicity of tocilizumab for severe COVID-19.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9149
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume18
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2021

Funding

Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • COVID-19
    • Systematic review and meta-analysis
    • Tocilizumab

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of tocilizumab therapy versus standard of care in over 15,000 covid-19 pneumonia patients during the first eight months of the pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this