Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Symptomatic Patients Remain at Substantial Risk of Arterial Disease Complications before and after Endarterectomy or Stenting

  • Cristina Hobeanu*
  • , Philippa C. Lavalleé
  • , Peter M. Rothwell
  • , Leila Sissani
  • , Gregory W. Albers
  • , Natan M. Bornstein
  • , Louis R. Caplan
  • , Geoffrey A. Donnan
  • , José M. Ferro
  • , Michael G. Hennerici
  • , Julien Labreuche
  • , Carlos Molina
  • , Philippe Gabriel Steg
  • , Pierre Jean Touboul
  • , Shinichiro Uchiyama
  • , Éric Vicaut
  • , Lawrence K.S. Wong
  • , Pierre Amarenco
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Stanford University
  • Tel Aviv University
  • University of Lisbon
  • University of Melbourne
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Harvard University
  • University Hospital Vall d'Hebron
  • University of Oxford
  • Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • International University of Health and Welfare
  • Université Paris-Diderot
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Purpose-After carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke, recurrent stroke risk falls to a low rate on modern medical treatment. Methods-We used data from 4583 patients with recent transient ischemic attack or minor stroke enrolled in the TIAregistry.org to perform a nested case-control analysis to evaluate pre-and post-CEA/CAS risk. Cases were defined as patients with a CEA/CAS during the 1-year follow-up period. For each case, 2 controls with a follow-up time greater than the time from qualifying event to CEA/CAS were randomly selected, matched by age and sex. Primary outcome was defined as major vascular events (MVE, including stroke, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction). Results-The median delay from symptom onset of qualifying event to CEA/CAS was 11 days (interquartile range, 6-23). Overall, patients with CEA/CAS had a higher 1-year risk of MVE than other patients (14.8% versus 5.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-3.60; P<0.001). During the matched preprocedural period, MVE occurred in 14 (7.5%) cases and in 13 (3.5%) controls, with an adjusted odds ratio =2.46 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-5.64; P=0.03). In the postprocedural period, the risk of MVE was also higher in cases than in controls (adjusted P<0.03). Conclusions-Patients with CEA/CAS had a higher 12-month risk of MVE, as well as during pre-and postprocedural periods. These results suggest that patients in whom CEA/CAS is anticipated are likely to be an informative population for inclusion in studies testing new antithrombotic strategies started soon after symptom onset.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1005-1010
Number of pages6
JournalStroke
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme692340

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Carotid arteries
    • Carotid endarterectomy
    • myocardial infarction
    • prevention
    • transient ischemic attack

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Symptomatic Patients Remain at Substantial Risk of Arterial Disease Complications before and after Endarterectomy or Stenting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this