Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Swift Monitoring of NGC 4151: Evidence for a Second X-Ray/UV Reprocessing

  • R. Edelson
  • , J. Gelbord
  • , E. Cackett
  • , S. Connolly
  • , C. Done
  • , M. Fausnaugh
  • , E. Gardner
  • , N. Gehrels
  • , M. Goad
  • , K. Horne
  • , I. McHardy
  • , B. M. Peterson
  • , S. Vaughan
  • , M. Vestergaard
  • , A. Breeveld
  • , A. J. Barth
  • , M. Bentz
  • , M. Bottorff
  • , W. N. Brandt
  • , S. M. Crawford
  • Elena Dalla Bontà, D. Emmanoulopoulos, P. Evans, R. Figuera Jaimes, A. V. Filippenko, G. Ferland, D. Grupe, M. Joner, J. Kennea, K. T. Korista, H. A. Krimm, G. Kriss, D. C. Leonard, S. Mathur, H. Netzer, J. Nousek, K. Page, E. Romero-Colmenero, M. Siegel, D. A. Starkey, T. Treu, H. A. Vogler, H. Winkler, W. Zheng
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Spectral Sciences, Inc.
  • Wayne State University
  • University of Southampton
  • Durham University
  • Ohio State University
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • University of Leicester
  • University of St Andrews
  • Space Telescope Science Institute
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Arizona
  • University College London
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Georgia State University
  • Southwestern University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • South African Astronomical Observatory
  • University of Padua
  • Astronomical Observatory of Padua
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of Kentucky
  • Morehead State University
  • Brigham Young University
  • Western Michigan University
  • Universities Space Research Association
  • San Diego State University
  • Southern African Large Telescope Foundation
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Johannesburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

144 Scopus citations

Abstract

Swift monitoring of NGC 4151 with an ∼6 hr sampling over a total of 69 days in early 2016 is used to construct light curves covering five bands in the X-rays (0.3-50 keV) and six in the ultraviolet (UV)/optical (1900-5500 Å). The three hardest X-ray bands (>2.5 keV) are all strongly correlated with no measurable interband lag, while the two softer bands show lower variability and weaker correlations. The UV/optical bands are significantly correlated with the X-rays, lagging ∼3-4 days behind the hard X-rays. The variability within the UV/optical bands is also strongly correlated, with the UV appearing to lead the optical by ∼0.5-1 days. This combination of ≳3 day lags between the X-rays and UV and ≲1 day lags within the UV/optical appears to rule out the "lamp-post" reprocessing model in which a hot, X-ray emitting corona directly illuminates the accretion disk, which then reprocesses the energy in the UV/optical. Instead, these results appear consistent with the Gardner & Done picture in which two separate reprocessings occur: first, emission from the corona illuminates an extreme-UV-emitting toroidal component that shields the disk from the corona; this then heats the extreme-UV component, which illuminates the disk and drives its variability.

Original languageEnglish
Article number41
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume840
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2017

Funding

FundersFunder number
TABASGO Foundation
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
National Research Foundation
UK Research and Innovation
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNNH13CH61C, NNX13AC63G, NNX13AE99G, NNX13AC26G
National Science FoundationAST-1412693, 1412315, 1412155, 1412693, 1253702, 1210311
Science and Technology Facilities CouncilST/P002218/1, ST/P006892/1, ST/L005654/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/M003035/1, ST/N000811/1, ST/M001296/1, AST-1253702
Christopher R. Redlich FundAST-1412315, AST-1009571, AST-1210311
Natur og Univers, Det Frie ForskningsrådDFF 4002-00275
UK Space AgencyAST-1211916

    Keywords

    • galaxies: Seyfert
    • galaxies: active
    • galaxies: individual (NGC 4151)
    • galaxies: nuclei

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Swift Monitoring of NGC 4151: Evidence for a Second X-Ray/UV Reprocessing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this