Sweeping of membranes vs. Intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for cervical ripening: Randomized trial

O. Gemer*, V. Kapustian, D. Harari, E. Sassoon, S. Segal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel and membrane sweeping for cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty patients were randomized to either intracervical prostaglandin E 2 or membrane sweeping. A Bishop score was assigned by a blinded examiner prior to and 24 hours following the procedure. When both sweeping the membranes and prostaglandin placement are applicable, the beneficial effects are similar. RESULTS: The Bishop scores assigned 24 hours after prostaglandin instillation and membrane sweeping were not significantly different (3.4, SE 0.42, vs. 3.3, SE 0.37, respectively; P > .05). The proportions of women entering active labor or delivering within 24 hours were similar in the prostaglandin and membrane groups (21% and 19%, respectively; P > .05). CONCLUSION: When both intracervical prostaglandin insertion and membrane sweeping are feasible, their salutary effects are comparable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-708
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of reproductive medicine
Volume46
Issue number8
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cervix
  • Induced
  • Labor
  • Prostaglandin E
  • Sweeping of membranes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sweeping of membranes vs. Intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for cervical ripening: Randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this