Surgically induced astigmatism assessment: Comparison between three corneal measuring devices

Shay Ofir*, Adi Abulafia, Guy Kleinmann, Olga Reitblat, Ehud I. Assia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the findings of three corneal measuring devices for calculating surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) during cataract extraction. METHODS: Patients' records were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who had corneal astigmatism measurements before and at least 1 month after cataract surgery through 2.4-mm corneal incisions by all three tested devices (Lenstar LS900, Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland; IOLMaster 500, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; and Atlas topographer, Carl Zeiss Meditec). Vector analysis was used to calculate the SIA for each measuring device. RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 49 patients were included. All three measuring devices had similar SIA results: the median SIAs were 0.45 diopters (D) for the Lenstar, 0.41 D for the IOLMaster, and 0.47 D for the Atlas topographer (P = .884). CONCLUSIONS: The three evaluated anterior corneal measuring devices produced similar results in measuring SIA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-247
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgically induced astigmatism assessment: Comparison between three corneal measuring devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this