Surgical management of spinal stenosis: A comparison of immediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations

Zeev H. Arinzon, Brian Fredman*, Edna Zohar, Shay Shabat, Jacob S. Feldman, Robert Jedeikin, Reuven J. Gepstein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

This retrospective study was performed to assess and compare the immediate safety and long term outcome of surgical decompression of spinal stenosis when performed for geriatric patients aged 65-74 years (Group A) and those >75 years (Group B) of age. Some 283 patients were studied (179 and 104 patients in Groups A and B, respectively). The mean follow-up time was 41.5 months (range: 9-115) and 42.9 months (range: 9-106) for Groups A and B, respectively. Within both treatment groups, there was a significant (P<0.0001) subjective improvement in low back and radicular pain, as well as the ability to perform daily activities. When compared to preoperative levels, the oral scores for pain while performing daily activities were significantly (P<0.001) improved in both treatment groups. The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the groups. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. However, since both Group A and B patients are likely to suffer minor perioperative complications, increased vigilance and careful monitoring are essential for this high risk population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-279
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Keywords

  • Geriatric patients
  • Lumbar spinal canal stenosis
  • Surgical outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical management of spinal stenosis: A comparison of immediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this