TY - JOUR
T1 - 18F-fluorocholine PET whole-body MRI in the staging of high-risk prostate cancer
AU - Metser, Ur
AU - Berlin, Alejandro
AU - Halankar, Jaydeep
AU - Murphy, Grainne
AU - Jhaveri, Kartik S.
AU - Ghai, Sangeet
AU - Tau, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Roentgen Ray Society.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether integrated 18F-fluoro-choline (FCH) PET whole-body MRI (PET/WBMRI) depicts lymph node and distant metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer more frequently than does conventional staging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective study included 58 patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer. After conventional staging (CT and bone scintigraphy), patients underwent FCH PET/WBMRI (n = 10) or FCH PET/CT and WBMRI (n = 48). Metastatic sites and disease stage were recorded for each modality (conventional imaging, PET, WBMRI, and PET/WBMRI) and compared with a standard of reference (histopathologic examination, imaging, and clinical follow-up) and early clinical outcomes. RESULTS. In the detection of metastases, PET had significantly higher sensitivity (72/77 [93.5%]) than conventional imaging (49/77 [63.6%]; p < 0.001) and WBMRI (56/77 [72.7%]; p = 0.002). There was a trend toward improved detection with PET/WBMRI (77/77 [100%]) compared with PET alone (p = 0.059). For correct NM staging, PET and PET/WBMRI performed better than conventional imaging (p = 0.002) and WBMRI (p = 0.008). Twelve of 56 patients (21.4%) had early biochemical failure after radical treatment (median, 7 months; range, 1-20 months). This rate was higher for patients with M1a or M1b disease at PET/ WBMRI than for others, but this finding did not reach statistical significance (4/8 [50%] vs 8/48 [16.7%]; p = 0.055). CONCLUSION. In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, FCH PET and FCH PET/ WBMRI depict significantly more metastatic lesions than do conventional imaging and WBMRI. Stage determined with PET/WBMRI may correlate with early outcomes.
AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether integrated 18F-fluoro-choline (FCH) PET whole-body MRI (PET/WBMRI) depicts lymph node and distant metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer more frequently than does conventional staging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A prospective study included 58 patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer. After conventional staging (CT and bone scintigraphy), patients underwent FCH PET/WBMRI (n = 10) or FCH PET/CT and WBMRI (n = 48). Metastatic sites and disease stage were recorded for each modality (conventional imaging, PET, WBMRI, and PET/WBMRI) and compared with a standard of reference (histopathologic examination, imaging, and clinical follow-up) and early clinical outcomes. RESULTS. In the detection of metastases, PET had significantly higher sensitivity (72/77 [93.5%]) than conventional imaging (49/77 [63.6%]; p < 0.001) and WBMRI (56/77 [72.7%]; p = 0.002). There was a trend toward improved detection with PET/WBMRI (77/77 [100%]) compared with PET alone (p = 0.059). For correct NM staging, PET and PET/WBMRI performed better than conventional imaging (p = 0.002) and WBMRI (p = 0.008). Twelve of 56 patients (21.4%) had early biochemical failure after radical treatment (median, 7 months; range, 1-20 months). This rate was higher for patients with M1a or M1b disease at PET/ WBMRI than for others, but this finding did not reach statistical significance (4/8 [50%] vs 8/48 [16.7%]; p = 0.055). CONCLUSION. In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, FCH PET and FCH PET/ WBMRI depict significantly more metastatic lesions than do conventional imaging and WBMRI. Stage determined with PET/WBMRI may correlate with early outcomes.
KW - Fluorocholine
KW - PET
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Staging
KW - Whole-body MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042788826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.17.18567
DO - 10.2214/AJR.17.18567
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29323548
AN - SCOPUS:85042788826
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 210
SP - 635
EP - 640
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 3
ER -