14C and the iron age chronology debate: Rehov, Khirbet En-Nahas, Dan, and Megiddo

Israel Finkelstein*, Eli Piasetzky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A recently published volume, The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science (Levy and Higham 2005), provides data related to the debate over the chronology of the Iron Age strata in the Levant (for a review, see Carmi 2006). The present article comments on several chapters in the volume. The article highlights methodological problems, such as insecure stratigraphic provenance of 14C samples, and demonstrates how unjustified selection of data can bias the result. The article offers a new interpretation to some of the results and shows that the full set of measurements from Tel Rehov supports the Low Chronology system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-386
Number of pages14
JournalRadiocarbon
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '14C and the iron age chronology debate: Rehov, Khirbet En-Nahas, Dan, and Megiddo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this