Structurally-defined alternatives

Roni Katzir*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scalar implicatures depend on alternatives in order to avoid the symmetry problem. I argue for a structure-sensitive characterization of these alternatives: the alternatives for a structure are all those structures that are at most as complex as the original one. There have been claims in the literature that complexity is irrelevant for implicatures and that the relevant condition is the semantic notion of monotonicity. I provide new data that pose a challenge to the use of monotonicity and that support the structure-sensitive definition. I show that what appeared to be a problem for the complexity approach is overcome once an appropriate notion of complexity is adopted, and that upon closer inspection, the argument in favor of monotonicity turns out to be an argument against it and in favor of the complexity approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-690
Number of pages22
JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alternatives
  • Complexity
  • Horn scales
  • Scalar implicature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structurally-defined alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this