TY - JOUR
T1 - Stimulation better targets fast-ripple generating networks in super responders to the responsive neurostimulator system
AU - Weiss, Shennan Aibel
AU - Eliashiv, Dawn
AU - Stern, John
AU - Rubinstein, Daniel
AU - Fried, Itzhak
AU - Wu, Chengyuan
AU - Sharan, Ashwini
AU - Engel, Jerome
AU - Staba, Richard
AU - Sperling, Michael R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 International League Against Epilepsy.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - How responsive neurostimulation (RNS) decreases seizure frequency is unclear. Stimulation may alter epileptic networks during inter-ictal epochs. Definitions of the epileptic network vary but fast ripples (FRs) may be an important substrate. We, therefore, examined whether stimulation of FR-generating networks differed in RNS super responders and intermediate responders. In 10 patients, with subsequent RNS placement, we detected FRs from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) contacts during pre-surgical evaluation. The normalized coordinates of the SEEG contacts were compared with those of the eight RNS contacts, and RNS-stimulated SEEG contacts were defined as those within 1.5 cm3 of the RNS contacts. We compared the post-RNS placement seizure outcome to (1) the ratio of stimulated SEEG contacts in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ stimulation ratio [SR]); (2) the ratio of FR events on stimulated contacts (FR SR); and (3) the global efficiency of the FR temporal correlational network on stimulated contacts (FR SGe). We found that the SOZ SR (p =.18) and FR SR (p =.06) did not differ in the RNS super responders and intermediate responders, but the FR SGe did (p =.02). In super responders, highly active desynchronous sites of the FR network were stimulated. RNS that better targets FR networks, as compared to the SOZ, may reduce epileptogenicity more.
AB - How responsive neurostimulation (RNS) decreases seizure frequency is unclear. Stimulation may alter epileptic networks during inter-ictal epochs. Definitions of the epileptic network vary but fast ripples (FRs) may be an important substrate. We, therefore, examined whether stimulation of FR-generating networks differed in RNS super responders and intermediate responders. In 10 patients, with subsequent RNS placement, we detected FRs from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) contacts during pre-surgical evaluation. The normalized coordinates of the SEEG contacts were compared with those of the eight RNS contacts, and RNS-stimulated SEEG contacts were defined as those within 1.5 cm3 of the RNS contacts. We compared the post-RNS placement seizure outcome to (1) the ratio of stimulated SEEG contacts in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ stimulation ratio [SR]); (2) the ratio of FR events on stimulated contacts (FR SR); and (3) the global efficiency of the FR temporal correlational network on stimulated contacts (FR SGe). We found that the SOZ SR (p =.18) and FR SR (p =.06) did not differ in the RNS super responders and intermediate responders, but the FR SGe did (p =.02). In super responders, highly active desynchronous sites of the FR network were stimulated. RNS that better targets FR networks, as compared to the SOZ, may reduce epileptogenicity more.
KW - fast ripple
KW - high-frequency oscillation
KW - outcome
KW - responsive neurostimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150848049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/epi.17582
DO - 10.1111/epi.17582
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 36906958
AN - SCOPUS:85150848049
SN - 0013-9580
VL - 64
SP - e48-e55
JO - Epilepsia
JF - Epilepsia
IS - 5
ER -