Static stress transfer and earthquake triggering: No lower threshold in sight?

Alon Ziv*, Allan M. Rubin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The main objective of this study is to see if a lower threshold for earthquake triggering exists. Resolving this issue is important for the understanding of earthquake mechanics and for the purpose of hazard analysis. We compute the cumulative static stress changes imposed on 63 M ≥ 4.5 earthquakes in central California between 1969 and 1998, by adding the stress changes imposed by all previous M ≥ 4.5 earthquakes as a function of time prior to the events. We find that 85% of the cumulative stress changes at the time of rupture are positive for stress change magnitudes of >10 kPa (>0.1 bar), and 70% are positive for stress changes of <10 kPa (< 0.1 bar) as well as <1 kPa (<0.01 bar). A comparison between these results and those obtained for synthetic catalogs, in which the timing or focal mechanisms of the earthquakes were randomized, shows that this degree of triggering is very unlikely to be found in a random catalog. Thus we conclude that no lower threshold for earthquake triggering in central California has been found. We show that the temporal distribution of stress changes that discourage failure is consistent with the theoretical prediction that the time delay increases with the magnitude of the stress change.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2000JB900081
Pages (from-to)13631-13642
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Issue numberB6
StatePublished - 10 Jun 2000
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Static stress transfer and earthquake triggering: No lower threshold in sight?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this