Treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin: Old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents

Translated title of the contribution: Treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin: Old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents

Michelle L. Campbell, Dror Marchaim*, Jason M. Pogue, Bharath Sunkara, Suchitha Bheemreddy, Pradeep Bathina, Harish Pulluru, Neelu Chugh, Melanie N. Wilson, Judy Moshos, Kimberley Ku, Kayoko Hayakawa, Emily T. Martin, Paul R. Lephart, Michael J. Rybak, Keith S. Kaye

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 μg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 μg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records. RESULTS: There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin.

Translated title of the contributionTreatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin: Old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1587-1597
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
Volume46
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Heterogenous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
  • Minimum inhibitory concentration
  • Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
  • Vancomycin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin: Old (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) versus new (daptomycin or linezolid) agents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this