TY - JOUR
T1 - Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt
T2 - A Comparative Study and Literature Review
AU - Moisseiev, Elad
AU - Zunz, Eran
AU - Tzur, Rotem
AU - Kurtz, Shimon
AU - Shemesh, Gabi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/8/19
Y1 - 2015/8/19
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. Results: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. Conclusions: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between standard trabeculectomy and the Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 100 eyes of 100 patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ex-PRESS shunt implantation between July 2010 and June 2012 was conducted. Of these, 61 (61%) eyes underwent trabeculectomy and 39 (39%) eyes underwent Ex-PRESS shunt implantation. Demographic information, glaucoma type, surgical details, preoperative, and postoperative data including intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, reoperation, and occurrence of any complications were recorded. Results: No differences in IOP reduction or number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications were demonstrated between the 2 procedures. Success rates were 86.9% for trabeculectomy and 84.6% for Ex-PRESS shunt. Rates of failure and hypotony were not significantly different between the groups. No parameter was correlated with success or failure of any procedure. Conclusions: Standard trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS shunt have similar efficacy and safety profiles. As the Ex-PRESS shunt is considerably more expensive, its use may be unjustified, especially as a primary procedure.
KW - Ex-PRESS
KW - glaucoma
KW - intraocular pressure
KW - trabeculectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939562527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047
DO - 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 24633088
AN - SCOPUS:84939562527
SN - 1057-0829
VL - 24
SP - 410
EP - 416
JO - Journal of Glaucoma
JF - Journal of Glaucoma
IS - 6
ER -