Stability of 13C-Urea Breath Test Samples Over Time in the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

Tsachi Tsadok Perets, Einav Shporn, Doron Boltin, Ram Dickman, Yaron Niv

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The accuracy and repeatability of breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection have not been adequately investigated. Although it has been shown that storage for long periods does not affect the analysis results, no data are available on the effect of repetitive testing. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the repeatability of the analyses of breath samples at room temperature. Methods: A total of 202 positive breath samples were collected in duplicates, before and after administration of 75 mg 13C- urea dissolved in 100 ml of orange juice. Breath test results were expressed as delta 13CO2. The cut-off value was 3.5 parts per thousand. Each sample was analyzed in a mass spectrometer 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after collection. The accuracy calculation was based on the comparison of the delta 13CO2 obtained in the three consecutive weeks following the first test run to the delta 13CO2 obtained in the first test run. Results: Two hundred (99%), 197 (97.52%), and 196 (97%) of the 202 samples tested positive in the second, third, and fourth test runs, respectively. The accuracy of the delta 13CO2 was 98.6%, 99.2%, and 96.7% in the three consecutive runs, respectively. Conclusion: Short-term storage of 1 month does not affect sample stability or the results of 13C-urea breath tests in up to three consecutive repeats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-234
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016

Keywords

  • C-urea breath test
  • H. pylori diagnosis
  • IRMS
  • Reproducibility
  • Test accuracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of 13C-Urea Breath Test Samples Over Time in the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this