Ssz1 restores endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation in cells expressing defective Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 complex by upregulating Cdc48

Eran Bosis, Dor Salomon, Orit Ohayon, Gilad Sivan, Shoshana Bar-Nun*, Efrat Rabinovich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway eliminates aberrant proteins from the ER. The key role of Cdc48p-Ufd1p-Npl4p is indicated by impaired ERAD in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with mutations in any of this complex's genes. We identified SSZ1 in genetic screens for cdc48-10 suppressors and show that it upregulates Cdc48p via the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) network. A pSSZ1 plasmid restored impaired ERAD-M of 6myc-Hmg2 in cdc48-10, ufd1-2, and npl4-1, while SSZ1 deletion had no effect. Ssz1p activates Pdr1p, the PDR master regulator. Indeed, plasmids of PDR1 or its target gene RPN4 increased cdc48-10p levels and restored ERAD-M in cdc48-10. Rpn4p regulates transcription of proteasome subunits and CDC48, thus RPN4 deletion abolished ERAD. However, the diminished proteasome level in Δrpn4 was sufficient for degrading a cytosolic substrate, whereas the impaired ERAD-M was the result of diminished Cdc48p and was restored by expression of pCDC48. The corrected ERAD-M in the hypomorphic strains of the Cdc48 partners ufd1-2 and npl4-1 by the pCDC48 plasmid, and in cdc48-10 cells by the pcdc48-10 plasmid, combined with the finding that neither pSSZ1 nor pcdc48-10 restored ERAD-L of CPY*-HA, support our conclusion that Ssz1p suppressing effects is brought about by upregulating Cdc48p.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-706
Number of pages12
JournalGenetics
Volume184
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ssz1 restores endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation in cells expressing defective Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 complex by upregulating Cdc48'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this