TY - JOUR
T1 - Song recognition by young children with cochlear implants
T2 - Comparison between unilateral, bilateral, and bimodal users
AU - Bartov, Tamar
AU - Most, Tova
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Method: Participants included 45 children ages 3;8-7;3 (years;months): 12 with NH and 33 with CIs, including 10 with unilateral CI, 14 with bilateral CIs, and 9 bimodal users (CI-HA) with unilateral CI and contralateral hearing aid. Preschoolers were asked to identify children’s songs presented via 5 versions: (a) full (lyrics sung with piano accompaniment); (b) a cappella (only lyrics); (c) melodic (matching main melodic contour); (d) tonal (only pitch information); and (e) rhythmic (only song’s rhythm).Purpose: To examine song identification by preschoolers with normal hearing (NH) versus preschoolers with cochlear implants (CIs).Results: The NH group surpassed all CI groups at identifying songs via melodic and tonal versions, but no significant differences emerged between the NH group and any CI group via full, a cappella, or rhythmic versions. Among the CI groups, no significant differences emerged via melodic or rhythmic versions, but bimodal users performed significantly better than bilateral users via the tonal version. Chronological age and duration of CI use correlated significantly with identification via the rhythmic version.Conclusion: Bimodal users showed an advantage in identifying songs in the tonal version through use of complementary information.
AB - Method: Participants included 45 children ages 3;8-7;3 (years;months): 12 with NH and 33 with CIs, including 10 with unilateral CI, 14 with bilateral CIs, and 9 bimodal users (CI-HA) with unilateral CI and contralateral hearing aid. Preschoolers were asked to identify children’s songs presented via 5 versions: (a) full (lyrics sung with piano accompaniment); (b) a cappella (only lyrics); (c) melodic (matching main melodic contour); (d) tonal (only pitch information); and (e) rhythmic (only song’s rhythm).Purpose: To examine song identification by preschoolers with normal hearing (NH) versus preschoolers with cochlear implants (CIs).Results: The NH group surpassed all CI groups at identifying songs via melodic and tonal versions, but no significant differences emerged between the NH group and any CI group via full, a cappella, or rhythmic versions. Among the CI groups, no significant differences emerged via melodic or rhythmic versions, but bimodal users performed significantly better than bilateral users via the tonal version. Chronological age and duration of CI use correlated significantly with identification via the rhythmic version.Conclusion: Bimodal users showed an advantage in identifying songs in the tonal version through use of complementary information.
KW - Children
KW - Cochlear implants
KW - Song recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907721411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0190
DO - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0190
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84907721411
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 57
SP - 1929
EP - 1941
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 5
ER -