TY - JOUR
T1 - Some determinants of latent inhibition in human predictive learning
AU - Pineño, Oskar
AU - de la Casa, Luis Gonzalo
AU - Lubow, R. E.
AU - Miller, Ralph R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Oskar Pineño was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education (Ref. EX2002-0739). Luis Gonzalo de la Casa was supported by Grant BSO2002-01136 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology. We thank Jeffrey C. Amundson, Olga Lipatova, Gonzalo P. Urcelay, Kouji Urushihara, Miguel A. Vadillo, and Daniel S. Wheeler for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript, as well as Estrella Díaz and Olga Lipatova for their assistance in running the experiments.
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - The present experiments assessed the effects of different manipulations between cue preexposure and cue-outcome pairings on latent inhibition (LI) in a predictive learning task with human participants. To facilitate LI, preexposure and acquisition with the target cues took place while participants performed a secondary task. Presentation of neither the target cues nor the target outcome was anticipated based on the instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated the LI effect in the new experimental preparation. Experiment 2 analyzed the impact on LI of different activities that participants performed during the interval between preexposure and acquisition. Experiment 3 assessed LI as a function of changes in the secondary task cues made between preexposure and acquisition, namely presenting novel cues and reversing the cue-outcome contingencies. All of the manipulations in Experiments 2 and 3 resulted in a decrease in LI. The attenuation of LI by these manipulations challenges most current theories of learning and is best accommodated by Conditioned Attention Theory (Lubow, Weiner, & Schnur, 1981).
AB - The present experiments assessed the effects of different manipulations between cue preexposure and cue-outcome pairings on latent inhibition (LI) in a predictive learning task with human participants. To facilitate LI, preexposure and acquisition with the target cues took place while participants performed a secondary task. Presentation of neither the target cues nor the target outcome was anticipated based on the instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated the LI effect in the new experimental preparation. Experiment 2 analyzed the impact on LI of different activities that participants performed during the interval between preexposure and acquisition. Experiment 3 assessed LI as a function of changes in the secondary task cues made between preexposure and acquisition, namely presenting novel cues and reversing the cue-outcome contingencies. All of the manipulations in Experiments 2 and 3 resulted in a decrease in LI. The attenuation of LI by these manipulations challenges most current theories of learning and is best accommodated by Conditioned Attention Theory (Lubow, Weiner, & Schnur, 1981).
KW - Associative models of learning
KW - Human predictive learning
KW - Latent inhibition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32544455925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:32544455925
SN - 0023-9690
VL - 37
SP - 42
EP - 65
JO - Learning and Motivation
JF - Learning and Motivation
IS - 1
ER -