Some determinants of latent inhibition in human predictive learning

Oskar Pineño, Luis Gonzalo de la Casa, R. E. Lubow, Ralph R. Miller*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present experiments assessed the effects of different manipulations between cue preexposure and cue-outcome pairings on latent inhibition (LI) in a predictive learning task with human participants. To facilitate LI, preexposure and acquisition with the target cues took place while participants performed a secondary task. Presentation of neither the target cues nor the target outcome was anticipated based on the instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated the LI effect in the new experimental preparation. Experiment 2 analyzed the impact on LI of different activities that participants performed during the interval between preexposure and acquisition. Experiment 3 assessed LI as a function of changes in the secondary task cues made between preexposure and acquisition, namely presenting novel cues and reversing the cue-outcome contingencies. All of the manipulations in Experiments 2 and 3 resulted in a decrease in LI. The attenuation of LI by these manipulations challenges most current theories of learning and is best accommodated by Conditioned Attention Theory (Lubow, Weiner, & Schnur, 1981).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-65
Number of pages24
JournalLearning and Motivation
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • Associative models of learning
  • Human predictive learning
  • Latent inhibition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some determinants of latent inhibition in human predictive learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this